Developing institutional strategies to support failing/failed part-time students in higher education: Recommendations for practice and field educators

Abstract

This study considers the significance of institutional strategy in supporting failing/failed part-time students in higher education, particularly at a time of such significant changes to funding ideologies in western cultures, and offers recommendations to improve student retention. Building on previous studies by Simpson (2003), Callender et al (2006) the tracking of three cohorts of part-time students on a counselling programme highlights ‘vulnerable’ candidates and explores specific strategies to respond to the failing/failed student. Employing a mixed-methodological approach consisting of an initial online questionnaire, semi-structured interviews for selected participants and the tracking the academic results of failing/failed students, ethical consideration is given to the nature of the programme (counselling), gender-ratios and the timing of the enquiry (postcompletion or termination of studies). The enquiry highlights the challenges for practice educators and field instructors in supporting such students. In order to increase the retention of part-time students, the study also examines possible factors likely to minimise part-time student attrition. For the purposes of this study the term ‘vulnerable’ is defined as a student who is likely to leave the course before completion i.e. a failing/failed student.