A QoE Perspective on HTTP/2 Server Push

T. Zimmermann, Benedikt Wolters, O. Hohlfeld
{"title":"A QoE Perspective on HTTP/2 Server Push","authors":"T. Zimmermann, Benedikt Wolters, O. Hohlfeld","doi":"10.1145/3098603.3098604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"HTTP/2 was recently standardized to optimize the Web by promising faster Page Load Times (PLT) as compared to the widely deployed HTTP/1.1. One promising feature is HTTP/2 server push, which turns the former pull-only into a push-enabled Web. By enabling servers to preemptively push resources to the clients without explicit request, it promises further improvements of the overall PLT. Despite this potential, it remains unknown if server push can indeed yield human perceivable improvements. In this paper, we address this open question by assessing server push in both i) a laboratory and ii) a crowdsourcing study. Our study assesses the question if server push can lead to perceivable faster PLTs as compared to HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2 without push. We base this study on a set of 28 push-enabled real-word websites selected in an Internet-wide measurement. Our results reveal that our subjects are able to perceive utilization of server push. However, its usage does not necessarily accomplish perceived PLT improvements and can sometimes even be noticeably detrimental.","PeriodicalId":164573,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Workshop on QoE-based Analysis and Management of Data Communication Networks","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Workshop on QoE-based Analysis and Management of Data Communication Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3098603.3098604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

HTTP/2 was recently standardized to optimize the Web by promising faster Page Load Times (PLT) as compared to the widely deployed HTTP/1.1. One promising feature is HTTP/2 server push, which turns the former pull-only into a push-enabled Web. By enabling servers to preemptively push resources to the clients without explicit request, it promises further improvements of the overall PLT. Despite this potential, it remains unknown if server push can indeed yield human perceivable improvements. In this paper, we address this open question by assessing server push in both i) a laboratory and ii) a crowdsourcing study. Our study assesses the question if server push can lead to perceivable faster PLTs as compared to HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2 without push. We base this study on a set of 28 push-enabled real-word websites selected in an Internet-wide measurement. Our results reveal that our subjects are able to perceive utilization of server push. However, its usage does not necessarily accomplish perceived PLT improvements and can sometimes even be noticeably detrimental.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
HTTP/2服务器推送的QoE视角
HTTP/2最近被标准化,通过承诺比广泛部署的HTTP/1.1更快的页面加载时间(PLT)来优化Web。一个很有前途的特性是HTTP/2服务器推送,它将以前的只拉的Web转变为支持推送的Web。通过允许服务器在没有显式请求的情况下先发制人地将资源推送到客户端,它有望进一步改进整体PLT。尽管有这种潜力,但服务器推送是否真的能带来人类可感知的改进仍不得而知。在本文中,我们通过在i)实验室和ii)众包研究中评估服务器推送来解决这个开放性问题。我们的研究评估了这样一个问题:与没有推送的HTTP/1.1和HTTP/2相比,服务器推送是否能导致可感知的更快的plt。我们的研究基于在互联网范围内的测量中选择的一组28个启用推送的真实世界网站。我们的研究结果表明,我们的受试者能够感知服务器推送的利用。然而,它的使用并不一定能实现预期的PLT改进,有时甚至可能明显有害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Server and Content Selection for MPEG DASH Video Streaming with Client Information On Active Sampling of Controlled Experiments for QoE Modeling Designing a Survey Tool for Monitoring Enterprise QoE PAIN: A Passive Web Speed Indicator for ISPs On the Bitrate Adaptation of Shared Media Experience Services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1