More than a Fair Share? Principal-Principal Conflicts in Emerging Markets: Evidence from India

Radha Ladkani
{"title":"More than a Fair Share? Principal-Principal Conflicts in Emerging Markets: Evidence from India","authors":"Radha Ladkani","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2311977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concentrated ownership structure of emerging market firms may help mitigate principal-agent conflicts; however, the presence of two sets of principals, promoters with controlling stake and dispersed shareholders, may give rise to principal-principal conflicts. India, where firms are largely organized as business groups, with stock pyramids and complex cross-ownership structures, presents a distinctive venue to study the presence of such conflicts. This paper tests if the principal-principal conflicts transpire in the form of risk aversion when Indian bidders seek to merge or acquire. We observe that Indian bidders resort to risk-aversion only when promoters have high cash flow rights, that is, when they hold a majority stake in the acquiring firm. We argue that in business group firms this happens due to ‘tunnelling distortion’, whereas in standalone firms, this occurs due to ‘portfolio concentration’.","PeriodicalId":343950,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance: International/Non-US eJournal","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance: International/Non-US eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2311977","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The concentrated ownership structure of emerging market firms may help mitigate principal-agent conflicts; however, the presence of two sets of principals, promoters with controlling stake and dispersed shareholders, may give rise to principal-principal conflicts. India, where firms are largely organized as business groups, with stock pyramids and complex cross-ownership structures, presents a distinctive venue to study the presence of such conflicts. This paper tests if the principal-principal conflicts transpire in the form of risk aversion when Indian bidders seek to merge or acquire. We observe that Indian bidders resort to risk-aversion only when promoters have high cash flow rights, that is, when they hold a majority stake in the acquiring firm. We argue that in business group firms this happens due to ‘tunnelling distortion’, whereas in standalone firms, this occurs due to ‘portfolio concentration’.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超过公平份额?新兴市场的主要冲突:来自印度的证据
新兴市场企业集中的股权结构有助于缓解委托代理冲突;但是,控股发起人和分散股东这两组委托人的存在,可能会产生principal-principal冲突。在印度,公司大多以商业集团的形式组织起来,拥有股票金字塔和复杂的交叉所有权结构,这为研究此类冲突的存在提供了一个独特的场所。本文检验了印度竞标者在并购过程中是否以风险规避的形式发生了principal-principal冲突。我们观察到,只有当发起人拥有高现金流权利时,即当他们持有收购公司的多数股权时,印度竞标者才会采取风险规避措施。我们认为,在商业集团公司中,这是由于“隧道扭曲”而发生的,而在独立公司中,这是由于“投资组合集中”而发生的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New Japan’s Corporate Governance Code and its Scrutiny from the Perspective of 'Sustainable Growth of the Company and Improvement of Medium-to Long-Term Corporate Value' (Presentation Slides) Cross-Border Mergers: What does Market reaction tell us about Post-Merger Performance? Country‐, Firm‐ and Director‐level Risk and Responsibilities and Independent Director Compensation Decoding the Distribution of House Price & Income Mix Ratio (HPIMR) to Calculate the Proportionate Investments required for Housing Demand based on Affordability in India at the Country Level Alibaba: A Case Study of Synthetic Control
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1