Comparison of Effectiveness between Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) and Problem-Based Learning (PBL) Approach on the Interest of Junior High School Students

Junianto, D. U. Wutsqa
{"title":"Comparison of Effectiveness between Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) and Problem-Based Learning (PBL) Approach on the Interest of Junior High School Students","authors":"Junianto, D. U. Wutsqa","doi":"10.1145/3348400.3348407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to reveal the effectiveness of contextual teaching and learning (CTL) and problem-based learning (PBL) approaches on students' interest. This study was quasi-experimental research with pretest-posttest group design. The population of this research was all students of grade VIII of State Junior High School 9 Yogyakarta. Then, the sample involved 34 Junior High School students in each class that has been taken using purposive random sampling. The first experiment class used Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) approach, and the second one used the Problem-Based Learning (PBL) approach. The instrument was the interest questionnaire which was given to the students before (pretest) and after treatment (posttest). The data were analyzed using one sample t-test with a significance level of 5% to find out the effectiveness of CTL and PBL approaches on students' interest. Then, the data were analyzed using independent sample t-test to compare the effectiveness of both approaches. The results showed that both CTL and PBL methods were effective in terms of students' interest mean scores. The comparison result demonstrated that CTL was more effective than PBL to improve the interest of junior high school students.","PeriodicalId":297459,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Mathematics, Science and Technology Teaching and Learning - ICMSTTL 2019","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Mathematics, Science and Technology Teaching and Learning - ICMSTTL 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3348400.3348407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to reveal the effectiveness of contextual teaching and learning (CTL) and problem-based learning (PBL) approaches on students' interest. This study was quasi-experimental research with pretest-posttest group design. The population of this research was all students of grade VIII of State Junior High School 9 Yogyakarta. Then, the sample involved 34 Junior High School students in each class that has been taken using purposive random sampling. The first experiment class used Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) approach, and the second one used the Problem-Based Learning (PBL) approach. The instrument was the interest questionnaire which was given to the students before (pretest) and after treatment (posttest). The data were analyzed using one sample t-test with a significance level of 5% to find out the effectiveness of CTL and PBL approaches on students' interest. Then, the data were analyzed using independent sample t-test to compare the effectiveness of both approaches. The results showed that both CTL and PBL methods were effective in terms of students' interest mean scores. The comparison result demonstrated that CTL was more effective than PBL to improve the interest of junior high school students.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
情境教学法与问题导向教学法对初中生兴趣的影响比较
本研究旨在探讨情境教学(CTL)与问题导向学习(PBL)对学生兴趣的影响。本研究为准实验研究,采用前测后测组设计。本研究的研究对象为日惹州立初中九年级的所有学生。然后,样本涉及每个班34名初中生,采用有目的随机抽样。第一个实验班采用情境教学法(CTL),第二个实验班采用基于问题的教学法(PBL)。工具是在治疗前(前测)和治疗后(后测)分别发给学生的兴趣问卷。数据分析采用单样本t检验,显著性水平为5%,以确定CTL和PBL方法对学生兴趣的有效性。然后,采用独立样本t检验对数据进行分析,比较两种方法的有效性。结果表明,CTL和PBL方法对学生的兴趣均分均有效。比较结果表明,CTL比PBL更能有效地提高初中生的学习兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Piloting Experiential Learning through 360° Video and 3d Printing to Improve System Modelling Influence of Natural Endowment of Users on the Safety of Household Appliances Based on the Consumer Survey Android and FIREBASE mBaaS-based Information System Design of Students Activity Unit (SAU) Using the Rational Unified Process (RUP) Method Periodic Solutions of Branched Space from Closed Orbits under Mixed Perturbations The Impact of Big Data on Health Care Services in Australia: Using Big Data Analytics to Categorise and Deal with Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1