User performance on typing tasks involving reduced-size, touch screen keyboards

M. F. Coleman, B. Loring, M. Wiklund
{"title":"User performance on typing tasks involving reduced-size, touch screen keyboards","authors":"M. F. Coleman, B. Loring, M. Wiklund","doi":"10.4271/912796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prospect of using a touch screen to interact with navigation displays led us to develop and evaluate three reduced-size, touch screen keyboards. One keyboard had a standard QWERTY layout; another had a modified QWERTY layout with keys aligned in a matrix; the third had a matrix of keys arranged in alphabetical order. Twenty adults varying in age and typing ability participated in the evaluation. Test results showed that subjects typed 25-26% faster on the QWERTY keyboards than on the alphabetical keyboard. The difference in typing speed between the two QWERTY keyboards was not significant. Additionally, differences in error rates among the three keyboards were not significantly different. Eleven out of 20 subjects preferred the standard QWERTY keyboard; 6 preferred the modified QWERTY keyboard; 3 preferred the alphabetical keyboard. These test results suggest that a reduced-size keyboard should employ a standard QWERTY key arrangement to achieve maximum usability.","PeriodicalId":126255,"journal":{"name":"Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference, 1991","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference, 1991","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/912796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

The prospect of using a touch screen to interact with navigation displays led us to develop and evaluate three reduced-size, touch screen keyboards. One keyboard had a standard QWERTY layout; another had a modified QWERTY layout with keys aligned in a matrix; the third had a matrix of keys arranged in alphabetical order. Twenty adults varying in age and typing ability participated in the evaluation. Test results showed that subjects typed 25-26% faster on the QWERTY keyboards than on the alphabetical keyboard. The difference in typing speed between the two QWERTY keyboards was not significant. Additionally, differences in error rates among the three keyboards were not significantly different. Eleven out of 20 subjects preferred the standard QWERTY keyboard; 6 preferred the modified QWERTY keyboard; 3 preferred the alphabetical keyboard. These test results suggest that a reduced-size keyboard should employ a standard QWERTY key arrangement to achieve maximum usability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用户在使用缩小尺寸的触摸屏键盘打字时的表现
使用触摸屏与导航显示交互的前景促使我们开发和评估了三种缩小尺寸的触摸屏键盘。一个键盘有标准的QWERTY布局;另一种是修改后的QWERTY布局,键在矩阵中对齐;第三个是按字母顺序排列的键矩阵。20名年龄和打字能力不同的成年人参与了评估。测试结果显示,受试者在QWERTY键盘上打字比在字母键盘上打字快25-26%。两种QWERTY键盘在打字速度上的差异并不显著。此外,三种键盘的错误率差异无显著性差异。20名受试者中有11人更喜欢标准的QWERTY键盘;6 .首选改进型QWERTY键盘;我更喜欢字母键盘。这些测试结果表明,缩小尺寸的键盘应该采用标准的QWERTY键排列,以实现最大的可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Signal preemption as a priority treatment tool for transit demand management An object-oriented traffic simulation with IVHS applications Intelligent driving—Prometheus approaches to longitudinal traffic flow control Highway automation: System modeling for impacts analysis Designing and implementing a PC-based, graphical, interactive, real-time advanced traveler information system that meets commuter needs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1