Do Stakeholders Belong in Corporate Finance?

John R. Becker-Blease
{"title":"Do Stakeholders Belong in Corporate Finance?","authors":"John R. Becker-Blease","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1159897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Economists and legal scholars have discussed the proper role of a public corporation since at least the early part of the 20th century. The two major schools of thought that have emerged from this discourse are frequently characterized as shareholder primacy and stakeholder primacy, noting that shareholders are one of many stakeholders. Until recently, however, this debate rarely made it into the MBA classroom. If the corporate objective function was discussed at all, it was typically treated in a cursory manner in the early stages of a corporate finance course, with shareholder primacy receiving the lion's share of attention. As a result, the shareholder primacy model has become the de-facto theory underlying MBA curricula. Recent events such as the failure of corporate governance systems, dramatic shifts in technology and production trends, and increased attention on the environment, however, have renewed interest in this debate among practitioners and academics alike. Efforts to redirect the focus of curricula have emerged, though almost exclusively from disciplines other than finance, and corporate finance faculty are frequently identified as the source of inertia against change.","PeriodicalId":177753,"journal":{"name":"SIB: Social Impacts Related to Finance (Topic)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIB: Social Impacts Related to Finance (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1159897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Economists and legal scholars have discussed the proper role of a public corporation since at least the early part of the 20th century. The two major schools of thought that have emerged from this discourse are frequently characterized as shareholder primacy and stakeholder primacy, noting that shareholders are one of many stakeholders. Until recently, however, this debate rarely made it into the MBA classroom. If the corporate objective function was discussed at all, it was typically treated in a cursory manner in the early stages of a corporate finance course, with shareholder primacy receiving the lion's share of attention. As a result, the shareholder primacy model has become the de-facto theory underlying MBA curricula. Recent events such as the failure of corporate governance systems, dramatic shifts in technology and production trends, and increased attention on the environment, however, have renewed interest in this debate among practitioners and academics alike. Efforts to redirect the focus of curricula have emerged, though almost exclusively from disciplines other than finance, and corporate finance faculty are frequently identified as the source of inertia against change.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利益相关者是否属于企业融资?
至少从20世纪初开始,经济学家和法律学者就一直在讨论公共公司的适当作用。从这一论述中出现的两大思想流派经常被描述为股东至上和利益相关者至上,并指出股东是众多利益相关者之一。然而,直到最近,这种辩论还很少进入MBA课堂。如果曾经讨论过公司目标函数,那么在公司金融课程的早期阶段,它通常是以一种粗略的方式处理的,股东至上受到了最大的关注。因此,股东至上模型已成为MBA课程事实上的理论基础。然而,最近发生的事件,如公司治理系统的失败、技术和生产趋势的急剧变化以及对环境的日益关注,重新引起了从业者和学者对这一辩论的兴趣。重新调整课程重点的努力已经出现,尽管这些努力几乎完全来自金融以外的学科,而企业金融教师经常被认为是抵制变革的惯性之源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Do Stakeholders Belong in Corporate Finance? Socially Responsible Investments in Germany, Switzerland and the United States - an Analysis of Investment Funds and Indices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1