Comparison of the outcome of diathermy versus scalpel skin incision in surgical cases

N. Khan, Shalabh Gupta, Tripta Bhagat
{"title":"Comparison of the outcome of diathermy versus scalpel skin incision in surgical cases","authors":"N. Khan, Shalabh Gupta, Tripta Bhagat","doi":"10.4103/sujhs.sujhs_12_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim and Objectives: The present study compared the outcome of diathermy versus scalpel skin incision in surgical cases. Materials and Method: The present Prospective interventional study was done at Santosh Medical College & Hospital for a period of 1.5 years. Group A included 100 patients treated with Scalpel and Group B included 100 patients treated with Diathermy. Results: The mean Incision time (s), Incision time (s/cm2) and Pain VRS score at day 1 and 2 was significantly more among Scalpel group compared to Diathermy group. The mean Blood loss in incision (ml) was significantly more among Diathermy group compared to Scalpel group. Conclusion: Due to shorter incision times, less blood loss, and less early postoperative discomfort, diathermy incisions have substantial benefits over scalpels in both elective and emergency general surgery.","PeriodicalId":326476,"journal":{"name":"Santosh University Journal of Health Sciences","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Santosh University Journal of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sujhs.sujhs_12_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim and Objectives: The present study compared the outcome of diathermy versus scalpel skin incision in surgical cases. Materials and Method: The present Prospective interventional study was done at Santosh Medical College & Hospital for a period of 1.5 years. Group A included 100 patients treated with Scalpel and Group B included 100 patients treated with Diathermy. Results: The mean Incision time (s), Incision time (s/cm2) and Pain VRS score at day 1 and 2 was significantly more among Scalpel group compared to Diathermy group. The mean Blood loss in incision (ml) was significantly more among Diathermy group compared to Scalpel group. Conclusion: Due to shorter incision times, less blood loss, and less early postoperative discomfort, diathermy incisions have substantial benefits over scalpels in both elective and emergency general surgery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
热疗与手术刀皮肤切开手术效果比较
目的和目的:本研究比较了外科病例中透热与手术刀皮肤切开的结果。材料和方法:本前瞻性介入研究在Santosh医学院和医院进行,为期1.5年。A组采用手术刀治疗100例,B组采用透热治疗100例。结果:手术刀组平均切口时间(s)、切口时间(s/cm2)及第1、2天疼痛VRS评分均显著高于透热组。平均切口出血量(ml)明显高于手术刀组。结论:由于切口时间短,出血量少,术后早期不适少,在择期和急诊普外科中,透热切口都比手术刀有明显的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Basic point-of-care ultrasound in the emergency department Post-COVID-19 impacts on male sexual and reproductive functions Country open-up, tourist coming from far East, concern on the imported SASR-Co-V2 variant Against the run of play: Use of oral ethanol to treat ethylene glycol poisoning An insight into new world health organization classification (2022) of odontogenic lesions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1