Borders between integrative medicine and EBM: significance, potential for use and legal issues in European Union member states. Narrative review

A. Jędrzejewska, B. Ślusarska, G. Nowicki
{"title":"Borders between integrative medicine and EBM: significance, potential for use and legal issues in European Union member states. Narrative review","authors":"A. Jędrzejewska, B. Ślusarska, G. Nowicki","doi":"10.2478/pielxxiw-2022-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Aim. The aim of the study is to present the meaning, potential of use and legal issues related to the use of complementary, alternative and integrative medicine in the European Union member states. Material and methods. Non-systematic review. Analysis of the literature on the subject covering the issues related to using and legal issues of complementary and alternative medicine methods in the context of the integration of Evidence Based Medicine methods into conventional medicine. Results. Despite attempts to introduce restrictions and introduce legal regulations regarding the use of unconventional medicine, it is still common to use unconfirmed methods, based on information searched on the Internet or using the services of people without any education in a given field. Lack of or insufficient regulations to manage the quality, safety and effectiveness of complementary and alternative medicine methods, and the lack of integration between the health care system and CAM pose the greatest risk. Conclusions. Due to the ever-increasing public demand for the use of complementary medicine methods, it is necessary to take steps to introduce integrative medicine that will ensure safe and effective patient-centered care, taking into account the comparability and availability of CAM practices in European Union member states.","PeriodicalId":326203,"journal":{"name":"Pielegniarstwo XXI wieku / Nursing in the 21st Century","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pielegniarstwo XXI wieku / Nursing in the 21st Century","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/pielxxiw-2022-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Aim. The aim of the study is to present the meaning, potential of use and legal issues related to the use of complementary, alternative and integrative medicine in the European Union member states. Material and methods. Non-systematic review. Analysis of the literature on the subject covering the issues related to using and legal issues of complementary and alternative medicine methods in the context of the integration of Evidence Based Medicine methods into conventional medicine. Results. Despite attempts to introduce restrictions and introduce legal regulations regarding the use of unconventional medicine, it is still common to use unconfirmed methods, based on information searched on the Internet or using the services of people without any education in a given field. Lack of or insufficient regulations to manage the quality, safety and effectiveness of complementary and alternative medicine methods, and the lack of integration between the health care system and CAM pose the greatest risk. Conclusions. Due to the ever-increasing public demand for the use of complementary medicine methods, it is necessary to take steps to introduce integrative medicine that will ensure safe and effective patient-centered care, taking into account the comparability and availability of CAM practices in European Union member states.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中西医结合和循证医学之间的界限:欧盟成员国的意义、使用潜力和法律问题。复习要点
抽象的目的。该研究的目的是提出的意义,使用的潜力和法律问题相关的补充,替代和综合医学在欧盟成员国的使用。材料和方法。缺乏系统性回顾。在循证医学方法与传统医学相结合的背景下,对有关补充和替代医学方法的使用和法律问题的文献进行分析。结果。尽管试图对使用非常规药物实行限制和制定法律条例,但仍然普遍采用未经证实的方法,根据在互联网上搜索的信息或利用在某一领域没有受过任何教育的人的服务。管理补充和替代医学方法的质量、安全性和有效性的法规缺乏或不足,以及卫生保健系统与辅助医学方法之间缺乏整合构成了最大的风险。结论。由于公众对使用补充医学方法的需求不断增加,有必要采取措施引入综合医学,以确保安全和有效的以患者为中心的护理,同时考虑到欧盟成员国CAM实践的可比性和可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cultural intelligence and multicultural personality of novice nurses in the midst of the refugee crisis in Poland – a preliminary report Consumerism in health care – review of Polish and world literature Nurses’ views and experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic The perception of ageism from the perspective of different professions Completed year of study moderating effect on the relation between coping strategies and self-esteem among novice nurses – cross sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1