Interest and Learning Approaches as Discriminating Factors in the Performance of Senior Secondary School Students in Economics

O. Oyetoro, Odeyemi Taiwo Grace, B. A. Adesina
{"title":"Interest and Learning Approaches as Discriminating Factors in the Performance of Senior Secondary School Students in Economics","authors":"O. Oyetoro, Odeyemi Taiwo Grace, B. A. Adesina","doi":"10.18844/CERJ.V9I1.3873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study utilized the ex-post facto research design to investigate how interest and learning approaches utilized in Economics discriminates the academic performance of students in the subject area. The population comprised senior secondary school two students in Ife Central Local Government of Osun State while the sample comprised 94 students in five secondary schools in the area. Three research instruments viz: Individual Interest Questionnaire (IIQ), Revised Two Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) and Economics Achievement Test (EAT) were used to collect appropriate data. The Discriminant Function Analysis was utilized to analyse data collected. Findings revealed a function with coefficients in order of magnitude as revealed by structure matrix as follows: Interest in Economics (1.06), Surface Approach (0.41) and Deep Approach (-1.14). None of coefficients was significant at 0.05 significance level. The function was maximized for: 47.1% of students who scored above 50% and 57.1% of those who scored below 50%. The conclusion that was reached was that adequate cognizance should be given to the improvement of the process of teaching the subject including assessment practices.   \nKey words: Discriminant Function Analysis; Interest; Learning Approaches; Performance; Senior Secondary School. \n ","PeriodicalId":115118,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Educational Researches Journal","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Educational Researches Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18844/CERJ.V9I1.3873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The study utilized the ex-post facto research design to investigate how interest and learning approaches utilized in Economics discriminates the academic performance of students in the subject area. The population comprised senior secondary school two students in Ife Central Local Government of Osun State while the sample comprised 94 students in five secondary schools in the area. Three research instruments viz: Individual Interest Questionnaire (IIQ), Revised Two Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) and Economics Achievement Test (EAT) were used to collect appropriate data. The Discriminant Function Analysis was utilized to analyse data collected. Findings revealed a function with coefficients in order of magnitude as revealed by structure matrix as follows: Interest in Economics (1.06), Surface Approach (0.41) and Deep Approach (-1.14). None of coefficients was significant at 0.05 significance level. The function was maximized for: 47.1% of students who scored above 50% and 57.1% of those who scored below 50%. The conclusion that was reached was that adequate cognizance should be given to the improvement of the process of teaching the subject including assessment practices.   Key words: Discriminant Function Analysis; Interest; Learning Approaches; Performance; Senior Secondary School.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
兴趣和学习方式对高中生经济学成绩的影响
本研究采用事后研究设计来调查经济学中使用的兴趣和学习方法如何区分学生在学科领域的学习成绩。人口包括奥孙州Ife中央地方政府的高中两名学生,而样本包括该地区五所中学的94名学生。采用个人兴趣问卷(IIQ)、修正双因素研究过程问卷(R-SPQ-2F)和经济学成就测验(EAT)三种研究工具收集适当的数据。采用判别函数分析法对收集到的数据进行分析。研究结果揭示了一个函数,其系数由结构矩阵显示如下:经济学兴趣(1.06),表面方法(0.41)和深度方法(-1.14)。各系数在0.05显著水平上均不显著。分数在50%以上的学生占47.1%,分数在50%以下的学生占57.1%。得出的结论是,应该充分认识到改进这门学科的教学过程,包括评估做法。关键词:判别函数分析;的兴趣;学习方法;性能;高中毕业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Learning Potential of the Alliance Between Theatre and Digital Games The effect of a Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) approach and reasoning ability on students' conceptual and procedural understanding Effect of outdoor learning inquiry-based activities on learners performance in science: A sequential explanatory design Is Indonesia's ELT Implementation Already Aligned with the Concept of 21st Century Language Teaching? The relationship between innovative leadership and educator performance in early childhood education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1