BASIC INCOME AND THE RIGHTS OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES

J. Pérez
{"title":"BASIC INCOME AND THE RIGHTS OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES","authors":"J. Pérez","doi":"10.17561/TAHRJ.N12.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities presents a social approach to disabilities. In accordance with this conception, the origin of the discrimination suffered by persons with disabilities is mainly social because we have designed our society without universal access for everybody. There is a normality criterion, based on physical capabilities, intelligence, race and gender that excludes many people from that canon. The different contemporary liberal theories of justice have discussed disabilities thinking about how the State could compensate brute luck. In this context, does universal basic income play some role? Van Parijs in Real Freedom for All defends a unanimous criterion to compensate for brute luck. That compensation would be made before distributing an equal basic income among everybody. In this paper, UBI will be studied in the context of the debate about rights of persons with disabilities. Firstly, the argument given by Van Parijs will be discussed because the unanimous requirement does not fit with a social understanding of disabilities. Secondly, if we consider a right to UBI, it is necessary to study which role this right can play in the life of people with disabilities and if we can say that this right has a universal design. In this point, it will be studied whether UBI can establish some type of indirect discrimination against people with disabilities and if so, which type of reasonable accommodation would be necessary to eliminate that discrimination.","PeriodicalId":164030,"journal":{"name":"The Age of Human Rights Journal","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Age of Human Rights Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17561/TAHRJ.N12.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities presents a social approach to disabilities. In accordance with this conception, the origin of the discrimination suffered by persons with disabilities is mainly social because we have designed our society without universal access for everybody. There is a normality criterion, based on physical capabilities, intelligence, race and gender that excludes many people from that canon. The different contemporary liberal theories of justice have discussed disabilities thinking about how the State could compensate brute luck. In this context, does universal basic income play some role? Van Parijs in Real Freedom for All defends a unanimous criterion to compensate for brute luck. That compensation would be made before distributing an equal basic income among everybody. In this paper, UBI will be studied in the context of the debate about rights of persons with disabilities. Firstly, the argument given by Van Parijs will be discussed because the unanimous requirement does not fit with a social understanding of disabilities. Secondly, if we consider a right to UBI, it is necessary to study which role this right can play in the life of people with disabilities and if we can say that this right has a universal design. In this point, it will be studied whether UBI can establish some type of indirect discrimination against people with disabilities and if so, which type of reasonable accommodation would be necessary to eliminate that discrimination.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基本收入和残疾人的权利
《残疾人权利公约》提出了一种社会对待残疾的方法。根据这一概念,残疾人遭受歧视的根源主要是社会,因为我们在设计我们的社会时没有为每个人提供普遍的机会。有一个基于身体能力、智力、种族和性别的正常标准,将许多人排除在标准之外。不同的当代自由主义正义理论讨论了残疾,思考国家如何补偿野蛮的运气。在这种背景下,全民基本收入是否起到了一定的作用?Van Parijs在《人人享有真正的自由》一书中捍卫了一个一致的标准,以补偿野蛮的运气。这种补偿将在每个人都获得平等的基本收入之前进行。本文将在残疾人权利辩论的背景下对全民基本收入进行研究。首先,Van Parijs给出的论点将被讨论,因为一致的要求不符合社会对残疾的理解。其次,如果我们考虑全民基本收入的权利,就有必要研究这项权利在残疾人的生活中可以发挥什么作用,以及我们是否可以说这项权利具有普遍的设计。在这一点上,将研究UBI是否可以建立对残疾人的某种间接歧视,如果是,哪种类型的合理便利是消除这种歧视所必需的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Legal Protection of the Right to Freedom and Personal Integrity of the Citizens of Ukraine (Private and Public Aspect) In Search of Durable Solutions for Refugees in Indonesia: A State Security and Human Rights Protection Approach Bottling the Criminal Contempt Law – A Search for ‘Intention’ in ‘Scandalizing the Court’ Right to Repatriation of Abandoned Seafarers: A Study in Light of Maritime Labour Convention 2006, and International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966 The Right to Universal Accessibility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1