COVID-19 and the Disinheritance of an Ableist World

Flowers
{"title":"COVID-19 and the Disinheritance of an Ableist World","authors":"Flowers","doi":"10.13169/intecritdivestud.4.1.0107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dr Johnathan Flowers is a Professorial Lecturer in the Department of Philosophy and Religion at American University. His current research focuses on developing an affective theory of experience, identity, and personhood through bridging American Pragmatism, Japanese Aesthetics, and Phenomenology. Flowers’s work also explores how identities are lived affectively through technology and society, with a specific emphasis on race, gender, and disability. ABSTRACT This paper will resituate the presumed accessibility gains that have emerged in the wake of COVID-19 not as gains for disabled people, but rather as the products of a world that is prepared for some people and some bodies and not for other people and other bodies. I will show that a more productive approach to understanding the sudden possibility of impossible accommodations would be accomplished by drawing upon Sara Ahmed’s treatment of the inheritance of a world, inheritance that places some objects within one’s reach while denying one access to other objects. On this view, ableism, as an organizing force in the world, serves to determine what bodies can and cannot do by virtue of the way that it “prepares” the world for some bodies and not for other bodies. As I will argue, the previous impossibility of the current widespread accommodations in academia and society broadly was due to the inheritance of an ableist world. designed to be inherited by some people and their bodies and not by other people and their bodies. the and points of encounter between but and and space navigate our tends to offer fits to majority bodies and create misfits with forms of embodiment, such as people with","PeriodicalId":224459,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Diversity Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Diversity Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13169/intecritdivestud.4.1.0107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Dr Johnathan Flowers is a Professorial Lecturer in the Department of Philosophy and Religion at American University. His current research focuses on developing an affective theory of experience, identity, and personhood through bridging American Pragmatism, Japanese Aesthetics, and Phenomenology. Flowers’s work also explores how identities are lived affectively through technology and society, with a specific emphasis on race, gender, and disability. ABSTRACT This paper will resituate the presumed accessibility gains that have emerged in the wake of COVID-19 not as gains for disabled people, but rather as the products of a world that is prepared for some people and some bodies and not for other people and other bodies. I will show that a more productive approach to understanding the sudden possibility of impossible accommodations would be accomplished by drawing upon Sara Ahmed’s treatment of the inheritance of a world, inheritance that places some objects within one’s reach while denying one access to other objects. On this view, ableism, as an organizing force in the world, serves to determine what bodies can and cannot do by virtue of the way that it “prepares” the world for some bodies and not for other bodies. As I will argue, the previous impossibility of the current widespread accommodations in academia and society broadly was due to the inheritance of an ableist world. designed to be inherited by some people and their bodies and not by other people and their bodies. the and points of encounter between but and and space navigate our tends to offer fits to majority bodies and create misfits with forms of embodiment, such as people with
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019冠状病毒病与残疾主义世界的继承权剥夺
乔纳森·弗劳尔斯博士是美国大学哲学与宗教系的教授讲师。他目前的研究重点是通过连接美国实用主义、日本美学和现象学,发展一种关于经验、身份和人格的情感理论。弗劳尔斯的作品还探讨了如何通过技术和社会有效地生活身份,特别强调种族,性别和残疾。本文将重新考虑2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情后出现的可访问性方面的假定成果,这些成果不是残疾人的成果,而是一个为某些人和某些机构而不是为其他人和其他机构准备的世界的产物。我将展示一种更有效的方法来理解不可能的适应的突然可能性,通过借鉴Sara Ahmed对世界的继承的处理,继承将一些对象放在一个人的触手可及的范围内,同时拒绝一个人访问其他对象。根据这种观点,残疾歧视作为世界上的一种组织力量,通过它为某些身体而不是其他身体“准备”世界的方式来决定身体能做什么和不能做什么。正如我将要论证的那样,以前学术界和社会广泛适应的不可能性是由于继承了一个残疾主义世界。被设计成由一些人和他们的身体来继承而不是由其他人和他们的身体来继承。但是和空间之间的相遇点引导我们倾向于为大多数身体提供契合,并与化身的形式产生不匹配,例如患有
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
International Journal of Critical Diversity Studies University Leaders as Inhibitors or Influencers of Systemic Change for Marginalised Youth Another World Exploring the Use of South African Ethnic and Racial Slurs on Social Media Hegemonic Masculinity in K. Sello Duiker's The Quiet Violence of Dreams
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1