Penerapan Model Pembelajaran SOLE (Self Organized Learning Environments) Pada Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri 1 Bukittinggi Berbantuan Aplikasi Microsoft Teams

Sukma Roviani, H. Idrus, Marjoni Imamora Ali Umar, Artha Nesa Chandra
{"title":"Penerapan Model Pembelajaran SOLE (Self Organized Learning Environments) Pada Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri 1 Bukittinggi Berbantuan Aplikasi Microsoft Teams","authors":"Sukma Roviani, H. Idrus, Marjoni Imamora Ali Umar, Artha Nesa Chandra","doi":"10.31958/je.v3i1.9541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". This study aimed to determine whether students who used the Self Organized Learning Environments (SOLE) learning model using the Microsoft Teams application had better learning outcomes than students who used the face-to-face learning model. The post-trial-only control group design is a study design used in quasi-experimental studies. The population of this study was XI IPA SMA Negeri 1 Bukittinggi. Two classes are sampled, that is, experimental class XI IPA 7 and control class XI IPA 6, which are sampled through normality test, homogeneity test and population mean similarity test. The sampling method uses simple random sampling where the results of the analysis found that both classes of samples are normally distributed, have homogeneous variants and the average population class is the same. The 20-question final exam is a tested and analyzed research tool. The experimental class achieved an average overall score of 80.13 for the cognitive domain, while the control class got an average final test score of 77.28. For the affective domain, the average value of the experimental class was 73.19, while the average value of the control class was 71.61. For the psychomotor domain, the average value of the experimental class was 73.51, while the average value of the control class was 70.04. The research hypothesis explains that \"the learning outcomes of students who apply the SOLE (Self Organized Learning Environments) learning model assisted by the Microsoft Teams application are better than the learning outcomes of students who apply the direct learning model\" formulated based on research results.","PeriodicalId":244772,"journal":{"name":"Edusainstika: Jurnal Pembelajaran MIPA","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edusainstika: Jurnal Pembelajaran MIPA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31958/je.v3i1.9541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

. This study aimed to determine whether students who used the Self Organized Learning Environments (SOLE) learning model using the Microsoft Teams application had better learning outcomes than students who used the face-to-face learning model. The post-trial-only control group design is a study design used in quasi-experimental studies. The population of this study was XI IPA SMA Negeri 1 Bukittinggi. Two classes are sampled, that is, experimental class XI IPA 7 and control class XI IPA 6, which are sampled through normality test, homogeneity test and population mean similarity test. The sampling method uses simple random sampling where the results of the analysis found that both classes of samples are normally distributed, have homogeneous variants and the average population class is the same. The 20-question final exam is a tested and analyzed research tool. The experimental class achieved an average overall score of 80.13 for the cognitive domain, while the control class got an average final test score of 77.28. For the affective domain, the average value of the experimental class was 73.19, while the average value of the control class was 71.61. For the psychomotor domain, the average value of the experimental class was 73.51, while the average value of the control class was 70.04. The research hypothesis explains that "the learning outcomes of students who apply the SOLE (Self Organized Learning Environments) learning model assisted by the Microsoft Teams application are better than the learning outcomes of students who apply the direct learning model" formulated based on research results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
。本研究旨在确定使用Microsoft Teams应用程序的自组织学习环境(Self - Organized Learning Environments, SOLE)学习模式的学生是否比使用面对面学习模式的学生有更好的学习效果。仅试验后对照组设计是准实验研究中使用的一种研究设计。抽样方法采用简单随机抽样,分析结果发现两类样本均为正态分布,具有均匀变异,平均总体类别相同。20个问题的期末考试是一个经过测试和分析的研究工具。实验班在认知领域的平均总分为80.13分,而控制班的平均期末成绩为77.28分。在情感领域,实验班的平均值为73.19,对照组的平均值为71.61。在精神运动领域,实验班的平均得分为73.51,对照组的平均得分为70.04。研究假设解释了“应用Microsoft Teams应用辅助下的自组织学习环境(Self Organized learning Environments, SOLE)学习模式的学生的学习效果优于根据研究结果制定的直接学习模式的学生”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Innovative Teaching Tools: Creating a Guided Inquiry Chemistry E-Module with FLIP PDF Support for Understanding Atom Developmentand the Periodic System of Elements Peningkatan Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Siswa melalui Problem Based Instruction (PBI) Validasi Modul Elektronik Gejala Pemanasan Global Terintegrasi Al-Qur’an dengan Model Contextual Teaching Learning (CTL) untuk Siswa Kelas XI SMA/MA Pengembangan Modul Biologi Berbasis Learning Cycle 7E Materi Sistem Ekskresi Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Resource Based Learning (RBL) Pada Hasil Belajar Biologi Kelas X SMA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1