Anatomization through generalization (AG): A hybrid privacy-preserving approach to prevent membership, identity and semantic similarity disclosure attacks

Rasha Saeed, Azhar Rauf
{"title":"Anatomization through generalization (AG): A hybrid privacy-preserving approach to prevent membership, identity and semantic similarity disclosure attacks","authors":"Rasha Saeed, Azhar Rauf","doi":"10.1109/ICOMET.2018.8346323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Individuals' data is creating a new trend of opportunity for different organizations. This data is termed as a tradable asset for business. Most of the companies collect and store data of individuals to be used for direct activities such as providing better services to their customers, or to be released for non-direct activities such as analysis, doing research, marketing and public health. This collected data may include sensitive information like criminal records, financial records and medical records, which may result in privacy threats if compromised. A number of approaches are used to ensure Privacy-Preserving Data Publishing (PPDP). But most of the existing methods don't prevent all main privacy disclosure attacks or cause substantial loss of information. In order to prevent membership, identity and semantic similarity attacks while maintaining usefulness of data, a hybrid approach is proposed in this paper. This approach combines the bucketization method of anatomization approach and generalization as well as suppression methods of anonymization approach to achieve the two major privacy requirements: (l, e) diversity and k-anonymity. Our experiment shows that from the view of data privacy, the proposed technique increases the diversity degree of sensitive values by 29% and 37% on average over (l, e) diversity and klredInfo techniques respectively. On the other hand from the view of information loss, the proposed technique reduces the Discernibility Penalty (DP)D by 30% on average over (l, e) diversity technique and increases it by 28% on average over klredIinfo technique. In addition, the proposed technique increased the Normalized Certainty Penalty (NCP) by 12% on average over klredInf technique. Hence the proposed technique preserves data privacy more effectively as compared to klredInfo and (l, e) diversity techniques while maintaining the utility of data.","PeriodicalId":381362,"journal":{"name":"2018 International Conference on Computing, Mathematics and Engineering Technologies (iCoMET)","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 International Conference on Computing, Mathematics and Engineering Technologies (iCoMET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOMET.2018.8346323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Individuals' data is creating a new trend of opportunity for different organizations. This data is termed as a tradable asset for business. Most of the companies collect and store data of individuals to be used for direct activities such as providing better services to their customers, or to be released for non-direct activities such as analysis, doing research, marketing and public health. This collected data may include sensitive information like criminal records, financial records and medical records, which may result in privacy threats if compromised. A number of approaches are used to ensure Privacy-Preserving Data Publishing (PPDP). But most of the existing methods don't prevent all main privacy disclosure attacks or cause substantial loss of information. In order to prevent membership, identity and semantic similarity attacks while maintaining usefulness of data, a hybrid approach is proposed in this paper. This approach combines the bucketization method of anatomization approach and generalization as well as suppression methods of anonymization approach to achieve the two major privacy requirements: (l, e) diversity and k-anonymity. Our experiment shows that from the view of data privacy, the proposed technique increases the diversity degree of sensitive values by 29% and 37% on average over (l, e) diversity and klredInfo techniques respectively. On the other hand from the view of information loss, the proposed technique reduces the Discernibility Penalty (DP)D by 30% on average over (l, e) diversity technique and increases it by 28% on average over klredIinfo technique. In addition, the proposed technique increased the Normalized Certainty Penalty (NCP) by 12% on average over klredInf technique. Hence the proposed technique preserves data privacy more effectively as compared to klredInfo and (l, e) diversity techniques while maintaining the utility of data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过泛化解剖(AG):一种防止成员、身份和语义相似泄露攻击的混合隐私保护方法
个人数据正在为不同的组织创造新的机会趋势。这些数据被称为商业的可交易资产。大多数公司收集和存储个人数据,用于直接活动,如为客户提供更好的服务,或用于非直接活动,如分析、研究、营销和公共卫生。这些收集的数据可能包括犯罪记录、财务记录和医疗记录等敏感信息,如果受到损害,可能会导致隐私威胁。使用了许多方法来确保保护隐私的数据发布(PPDP)。但是,现有的大多数方法并不能防止所有主要的隐私泄露攻击或造成大量信息丢失。为了防止隶属度、身份和语义相似攻击,同时保持数据的可用性,本文提出了一种混合方法。该方法结合了解剖法和泛化法的分类方法以及匿名化法的抑制方法,实现了两大隐私要求:(1)多样性和k-匿名性。我们的实验表明,从数据隐私的角度来看,所提出的技术将敏感值的多样性程度分别比(l, e) diversity和klredInfo技术平均提高了29%和37%。另一方面,从信息损失的角度来看,该技术比(l, e)多样性技术平均降低了30%的可分辨性惩罚(DP)D,比klredIinfo技术平均提高了28%。此外,该技术比klredInf技术平均提高了12%的归一化确定性惩罚(NCP)。因此,与klredInfo和(1,e)多样性技术相比,所提出的技术在保持数据效用的同时更有效地保护了数据隐私。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Energy optimized routing with directional antennas and tagging for multimedia sensor networks A study of big data for business growth in SMEs: Opportunities & challenges Electromagnetic bandgap wearable dipole antenna with low specific absorption rate Virtual team management challenges mitigation model (VTMCMM) FPGA and ARM processor based supercomputing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1