Physical Fitness Profile of Wheelchair-Bound Soldier: A Preliminary Study

Endang Ernandini, Trevino A. Pakasi
{"title":"Physical Fitness Profile of Wheelchair-Bound Soldier: A Preliminary Study","authors":"Endang Ernandini, Trevino A. Pakasi","doi":"10.36803/ijpmr.v9i2.297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTIntroduction: The Regulation of the Ministry of Defense No. 106 of 2016 regulates the process ofwhether a disabled soldier should retire or continue their career. Some soldiers can continue afterundergoing a rehabilitation program and fitness test called Uji Kesamaptaan. Unfortunately, the currentscoring system in Uji Kesamaptaan only fits for normal soldiers. The purpose of this study was todescribe the profile of normal and disabled soldiers who underwent physical fitness tests. The equalityvalue “Kesamaptaan table” with the running test can be used to assess the ability for disabilities by usinga wheelchair test?Methods: This preliminary study used a cross-sectional method and involved 46 soldiers who weredivided into two groups, disabled (n=16) and normal (n=30). All participants underwent a 12-minuterun or wheel test in a 400-meter track, to record the distance covered according to their ability. VO2Maxassessed using the Cardio-Pulmonary Exercise Test (CPET). Results were analyze using SPSS program;Independent T-test.Results: No significant difference was observed in the characteristics (age, body weight, height, andmass index) between the two groups. The VO2Max difference between normal soldiers and disabledsoldiers was highly significant. The highest score among disabled and normal soldiers was 38 L/min/kgBW and 64 L/min/kg BW, respectively. Normal soldiers covered 465m farther in a 12-minute run test.Conclusion: Kesamaptaan, the current scoring system for soldiers, can be considered unfair for thedisabled soldiers. The scoring system only includes for 12-minutes running test. Differences in theinvolvement of muscles and muscle type, affecting energy use and oxygen consumption between the12-minute run test and wheelchair pedal test. Therefore, value conversion is required for disabledsoldiers.Keywords: disabled persons, exercise test, physical fitness, VO2Max","PeriodicalId":247519,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36803/ijpmr.v9i2.297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTIntroduction: The Regulation of the Ministry of Defense No. 106 of 2016 regulates the process ofwhether a disabled soldier should retire or continue their career. Some soldiers can continue afterundergoing a rehabilitation program and fitness test called Uji Kesamaptaan. Unfortunately, the currentscoring system in Uji Kesamaptaan only fits for normal soldiers. The purpose of this study was todescribe the profile of normal and disabled soldiers who underwent physical fitness tests. The equalityvalue “Kesamaptaan table” with the running test can be used to assess the ability for disabilities by usinga wheelchair test?Methods: This preliminary study used a cross-sectional method and involved 46 soldiers who weredivided into two groups, disabled (n=16) and normal (n=30). All participants underwent a 12-minuterun or wheel test in a 400-meter track, to record the distance covered according to their ability. VO2Maxassessed using the Cardio-Pulmonary Exercise Test (CPET). Results were analyze using SPSS program;Independent T-test.Results: No significant difference was observed in the characteristics (age, body weight, height, andmass index) between the two groups. The VO2Max difference between normal soldiers and disabledsoldiers was highly significant. The highest score among disabled and normal soldiers was 38 L/min/kgBW and 64 L/min/kg BW, respectively. Normal soldiers covered 465m farther in a 12-minute run test.Conclusion: Kesamaptaan, the current scoring system for soldiers, can be considered unfair for thedisabled soldiers. The scoring system only includes for 12-minutes running test. Differences in theinvolvement of muscles and muscle type, affecting energy use and oxygen consumption between the12-minute run test and wheelchair pedal test. Therefore, value conversion is required for disabledsoldiers.Keywords: disabled persons, exercise test, physical fitness, VO2Max
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
轮椅束缚军人体能状况的初步研究
摘要导读:2016年国防部条例第106号规定了伤残军人退役或继续服役的程序。一些士兵在接受名为Uji Kesamaptaan的康复计划和体能测试后可以继续工作。不幸的是,目前Uji Kesamaptaan的计分系统只适用于普通士兵。本研究的目的是描述正常和残疾士兵进行体能测试的概况。“Kesamaptaan表”与跑步测试的相等值可以通过轮椅测试来评估残疾能力。方法:采用横断面法对46名士兵进行初步研究,将其分为残疾(n=16)和正常(n=30)两组。所有参与者都在400米的跑道上进行了12分钟的跑步或车轮测试,根据他们的能力记录所走的距离。使用心肺运动试验(CPET)评估最大摄氧量。结果采用SPSS程序进行分析;独立t检验。结果:两组患者的年龄、体重、身高、体质指数均无显著差异。正常士兵和伤残士兵的VO2Max差异非常显著。伤残士兵和正常士兵的最高得分分别为38 L/min/kgBW和64 L/min/kgBW。普通士兵在12分钟的跑步测试中多跑了465米。结论:现行军人Kesamaptaan计分制度对伤残军人不公平。计分系统只包括12分钟的跑步测试。在12分钟跑步测试和轮椅踏板测试之间,肌肉和肌肉类型的参与差异,影响能量使用和氧气消耗。因此,残疾军人需要价值转换。关键词:残疾人,运动测试,体能,最大摄氧量
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Disability Self-evaluation for Low Back Pain in COVID-19 Pandemic Effects of Additional Radial Shockwave Therapy to Median Nerve Gliding Exercises on Hand Grip Strength in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Patients The Validity and Reliability of Six Minute Walk Test in a 15 Meter Track Postural Control and Functional Performance Changes with Inspiratory Muscle Training in Chronic Kidney Disease Patient Disability in post Covid-19 Era
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1