The Impact of Online Learning In The Internal Medicine Rotation Among Medical Clerks During The Covid 19 Pandemic and Lockdown

M. Marcial
{"title":"The Impact of Online Learning In The Internal Medicine Rotation Among Medical Clerks During The Covid 19 Pandemic and Lockdown","authors":"M. Marcial","doi":"10.35460/2546-1621.2022-sp07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The impact of online learning during internal medicine rotation among graduating medical students was evaluated during COVID 19 pandemic. Objectives: The study aimed to gauge acceptability of a self-directed learning, recognize frustrations, identify coping mechanisms, assess rate of learning, evaluate study habits and appraise level of readiness in handling actual patients later in practice among graduating medical clerks. Methodology: An ambispective cohort design study involving both retrospective and prospective follow-up of respondents. The retrospective component involved blended learners with clinical experience (Group 1). The prospective component included online learner with clinical experience (Group 2) and online learner without clinical experience. Results: Group 1 showed that they favor pure traditional learning over pure online learning in contrast to the other 2 groups which rated acceptability of online learning high. All groups had high levels of frustration with their inability to experience actual patient exposure, had moderate to high level of coping mechanisms, and rated high the traditional learning and blended learning methodologies. In contrary, all groups rated low to moderate contributions of online learning to their learning. Group 3 had a significantly higher mean overall readiness score compared to the two other groups. Conclusion: The study showed the different levels of impact of online learning to the different population of medical clerks in terms of its acceptability as an alternative way of learning. Actual patient exposure is of main concern while different coping mechanisms maximize knowledge acquisition. Key words: Online learning, self directed, COVID 19 pandemic, Medical clerks","PeriodicalId":399180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine, University of Santo Tomas","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine, University of Santo Tomas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35460/2546-1621.2022-sp07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The impact of online learning during internal medicine rotation among graduating medical students was evaluated during COVID 19 pandemic. Objectives: The study aimed to gauge acceptability of a self-directed learning, recognize frustrations, identify coping mechanisms, assess rate of learning, evaluate study habits and appraise level of readiness in handling actual patients later in practice among graduating medical clerks. Methodology: An ambispective cohort design study involving both retrospective and prospective follow-up of respondents. The retrospective component involved blended learners with clinical experience (Group 1). The prospective component included online learner with clinical experience (Group 2) and online learner without clinical experience. Results: Group 1 showed that they favor pure traditional learning over pure online learning in contrast to the other 2 groups which rated acceptability of online learning high. All groups had high levels of frustration with their inability to experience actual patient exposure, had moderate to high level of coping mechanisms, and rated high the traditional learning and blended learning methodologies. In contrary, all groups rated low to moderate contributions of online learning to their learning. Group 3 had a significantly higher mean overall readiness score compared to the two other groups. Conclusion: The study showed the different levels of impact of online learning to the different population of medical clerks in terms of its acceptability as an alternative way of learning. Actual patient exposure is of main concern while different coping mechanisms maximize knowledge acquisition. Key words: Online learning, self directed, COVID 19 pandemic, Medical clerks
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在Covid - 19大流行和封锁期间,在线学习对医务人员内科轮换的影响
背景:本研究旨在评估2019冠状病毒病(COVID - 19)大流行期间应届医学生内科轮转期间在线学习的影响。目的:探讨毕业医务文员对自主学习的接受程度、挫折认知、应对机制、学习率、学习习惯和后期实际病人处理的准备程度。方法学:采用双视角队列设计研究,对调查对象进行回顾性和前瞻性随访。回顾性部分包括有临床经验的混合型学习者(第一组)。前瞻性部分包括有临床经验的在线学习者(第二组)和没有临床经验的在线学习者。结果:第一组学生对纯传统学习的接受程度高于纯在线学习,而另外两组学生对在线学习的接受程度较高。所有组都对无法体验实际的患者接触有高度的挫败感,有中等到高度的应对机制,对传统学习和混合学习方法的评价很高。相反,所有小组都认为在线学习对他们的学习贡献低到中等。与其他两组相比,第三组的平均总体准备得分明显更高。结论:本研究显示网络学习作为一种替代学习方式的可接受性对不同医疗文员群体有不同程度的影响。患者的实际暴露是主要关注的,而不同的应对机制最大限度地提高了知识获取。关键词:在线学习;自主学习;新冠疫情
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Current Insights into Covid-19 Vaccination Effectiveness of Platelet-Rich Plasma as an Adjunct to Core Decompression to Treatment Outcomes and Femoral Head Preservation in Avascular Necrosis of the Hip: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Clinical and Patient Reported Outcomes of Vitamin E Diffused Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Liner Versus Moderately Cross-Linked Polyethylene Liner in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis A Review of the Clinical Significance of Lumbar Puncture in the Diagnostic Approach of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (SAH): A Case Report of CT-Negative and Lumbar Puncture–Positive SAH A Basic Review of Sarcopenia Diagnosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1