Climate Change as Systemic Risk

B. Choudhury
{"title":"Climate Change as Systemic Risk","authors":"B. Choudhury","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3704962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hindsight tells us that COVID-19, thought by Trump and others to have come out of nowhere, is more aptly labelled a “gray rhino” event, one that was highly probable and one that we had the power to prevent. Indeed, despite considerable evidence of the impending threats of pandemics, for the most part, pandemic preparation was ignored, resulting in wide-scale social and economic losses. \n \nThe lessons from COVID-19 however should remind us of the perils of ignoring gray rhino risks. Nowhere is this more apparent than with climate change, a highly probable, high impact threat that has largely been ignored to date. Despite those who deny climate change, there remains ample evidence of the increasing temperature of the earth, which like COVID-19, has the potential not only to create public health emergencies but also to create wide scale, enormous adverse impacts on the economy. \n \nIndeed, the risks posed by climate change to the economy have the potential to be so far-reaching that it should, as this article argues, be termed a systemic risk. As such, the economic implications of climate change need to be mitigated in order to preserve economic stability. This is necessary not only for prudential and economic reasons, but also to protect citizens’ health and safety, and to ensure that business does not exceed the limits of the planet. \n \nWhile there has been some attention to addressing the economic implications of climate change at the global level, progress in the US has been minimal. This is surprising, not only because climate change has already caused unprecedented damage in certain parts of the country, but also because, to some extent, existing legislation and models may offer the tools to address the systemic risks of climate change. Drawing inspiration from the Dodd-Frank Act, SEC rules, and the FDIC model, among others, this article proposes regulatory approaches for mitigating climate change systemic risks in hopes that COVID-19 does not foreshadow our fate for climate change.","PeriodicalId":210981,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance: Social Responsibility & Social Impact eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance: Social Responsibility & Social Impact eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3704962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Hindsight tells us that COVID-19, thought by Trump and others to have come out of nowhere, is more aptly labelled a “gray rhino” event, one that was highly probable and one that we had the power to prevent. Indeed, despite considerable evidence of the impending threats of pandemics, for the most part, pandemic preparation was ignored, resulting in wide-scale social and economic losses. The lessons from COVID-19 however should remind us of the perils of ignoring gray rhino risks. Nowhere is this more apparent than with climate change, a highly probable, high impact threat that has largely been ignored to date. Despite those who deny climate change, there remains ample evidence of the increasing temperature of the earth, which like COVID-19, has the potential not only to create public health emergencies but also to create wide scale, enormous adverse impacts on the economy. Indeed, the risks posed by climate change to the economy have the potential to be so far-reaching that it should, as this article argues, be termed a systemic risk. As such, the economic implications of climate change need to be mitigated in order to preserve economic stability. This is necessary not only for prudential and economic reasons, but also to protect citizens’ health and safety, and to ensure that business does not exceed the limits of the planet. While there has been some attention to addressing the economic implications of climate change at the global level, progress in the US has been minimal. This is surprising, not only because climate change has already caused unprecedented damage in certain parts of the country, but also because, to some extent, existing legislation and models may offer the tools to address the systemic risks of climate change. Drawing inspiration from the Dodd-Frank Act, SEC rules, and the FDIC model, among others, this article proposes regulatory approaches for mitigating climate change systemic risks in hopes that COVID-19 does not foreshadow our fate for climate change.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
气候变化是系统性风险
事后经验告诉我们,被特朗普和其他人认为不知道从哪里冒出来的新冠肺炎,更恰当地称为“灰犀牛”事件,这是一种极有可能发生的事件,也是我们有能力预防的事件。事实上,尽管有大量证据表明大流行病的威胁即将来临,但在很大程度上,人们忽视了对大流行病的防范,造成了大规模的社会和经济损失。然而,2019冠状病毒病的教训应该提醒我们忽视灰犀牛风险的危险。这一点在气候变化问题上表现得最为明显,这是一种极有可能发生、影响巨大的威胁,但迄今在很大程度上被忽视了。尽管有人否认气候变化,但仍有充分证据表明,地球温度正在升高,这与COVID-19一样,不仅有可能造成突发公共卫生事件,而且还可能对经济造成大规模、巨大的不利影响。事实上,气候变化给经济带来的风险有可能影响深远,因此,正如本文所主张的那样,它应该被称为系统性风险。因此,必须减轻气候变化对经济的影响,以保持经济稳定。这不仅是出于审慎和经济原因,而且也是为了保护公民的健康和安全,并确保企业不会超出地球的极限。虽然在全球范围内解决气候变化对经济的影响已经引起了一些关注,但在美国取得的进展却微乎其微。这是令人惊讶的,不仅因为气候变化已经在该国的某些地区造成了前所未有的破坏,而且因为,在某种程度上,现有的立法和模式可能提供解决气候变化系统性风险的工具。从《多德-弗兰克法案》(Dodd-Frank Act)、美国证券交易委员会(SEC)规则和美国联邦存款保险公司(FDIC)模式等方面汲取灵感,本文提出了缓解气候变化系统性风险的监管方法,希望2019冠状病毒病不会预示我们在气候变化方面的命运。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CEO Pay Ratio Estimation under Social Pressure Strategic Leadership in Corporate Social Responsibility Does CSR Engender Trust? Evidence From Investor Reactions to Corporate Disclosures Tax Planning Knowledge Diffusion via the Labor Market Corporate Flexibility in a Time of Crisis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1