Rom for muntlighet? Språklig tenking og tekstsamtaler i norskfagets literacy

Atle Skaftun
{"title":"Rom for muntlighet? Språklig tenking og tekstsamtaler i norskfagets literacy","authors":"Atle Skaftun","doi":"10.23865/njlr.v6.2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artikkelen tar utgangspunkt i en forstaelse av tale og skrift som sentrale tanketeknologier og et helhetlig perspektiv pa literacy som tilgang til skriften, tekstmening og til diskursive fellesskap. Videre analyseres en literacy-hendelse fra en norsktime pa andre trinn, hvor klassen samtaler om leseleksa. Alle elementene i en helhetlig leseopplaering innrettet mot elevenes utvikling inn i skriften, teksten og den faglige diskursen er til stede i eksempelet, men ikke desto mindre illustrerer eksempelet hvordan manglende blikk for sammenhengen mellom muntlighet og tenking hindrer at elementene kombineres til en meningsfull helhet. Mot dette bakteppet diskuteres muntlighetens plass i norsk og nordisk skolepraksis og utdanningsforskning, med blikket rettet mot framtidens skole. \nAbstract \nDialogic space? Verbal thinking and text conversations in Norwegian L1 literacy \nThe starting point of this article is an understanding of oral and written language as thinking technologies and an integrated perspective on literacy, conceived of as access to writing, textual meaning and discursive communities. A literacy event is analyzed, from a grade two Norwegian (L1) lesson where the whole class is engaged in conversation about a reading assignment given as homework. All elements of an integrated reading education targeting student development into written language, text meaning and discursive community are present in the example. Nevertheless, the example also illustrates how the missing awareness of the connection between oral activity and thinking prevents the realization of the potential for integrating the elements of reading education into a meaningful, integrated whole. Against this backdrop, the place of oracy and dialogic activity in Norwegian and Nordic educational reseach and practice is discussed.","PeriodicalId":315285,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Literacy Research","volume":"8 10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Literacy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23865/njlr.v6.2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Artikkelen tar utgangspunkt i en forstaelse av tale og skrift som sentrale tanketeknologier og et helhetlig perspektiv pa literacy som tilgang til skriften, tekstmening og til diskursive fellesskap. Videre analyseres en literacy-hendelse fra en norsktime pa andre trinn, hvor klassen samtaler om leseleksa. Alle elementene i en helhetlig leseopplaering innrettet mot elevenes utvikling inn i skriften, teksten og den faglige diskursen er til stede i eksempelet, men ikke desto mindre illustrerer eksempelet hvordan manglende blikk for sammenhengen mellom muntlighet og tenking hindrer at elementene kombineres til en meningsfull helhet. Mot dette bakteppet diskuteres muntlighetens plass i norsk og nordisk skolepraksis og utdanningsforskning, med blikket rettet mot framtidens skole. Abstract Dialogic space? Verbal thinking and text conversations in Norwegian L1 literacy The starting point of this article is an understanding of oral and written language as thinking technologies and an integrated perspective on literacy, conceived of as access to writing, textual meaning and discursive communities. A literacy event is analyzed, from a grade two Norwegian (L1) lesson where the whole class is engaged in conversation about a reading assignment given as homework. All elements of an integrated reading education targeting student development into written language, text meaning and discursive community are present in the example. Nevertheless, the example also illustrates how the missing awareness of the connection between oral activity and thinking prevents the realization of the potential for integrating the elements of reading education into a meaningful, integrated whole. Against this backdrop, the place of oracy and dialogic activity in Norwegian and Nordic educational reseach and practice is discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文章的重点是以坦克技术为核心的故事和文章,以及以文章、技术和讨论为导向的识字的重要视角。我们通过视频分析了北欧和其他国家的扫盲情况,这些国家的扫盲情况与我们的扫盲工作有着异曲同工之妙。通过对文学作品、技术和日常讨论中的十一个使用场景的分析,我们可以发现,文学作品中的所有元素都被纳入了我们的计划中,这也说明了我们的计划将这些元素结合在一起,从而使文学作品和日常讨论之间的联系更加紧密。在此基础上,我们将讨论在北欧和北美的学校规划和实用性方面,如何利用对话空间。抽象对话空间?挪威语第一语言(L1)扫盲中的口头思维和文本对话 本文的出发点是将口头和书面语言理解为思维技术,并从综合的角度看待扫盲,将扫盲视为获得写作、文本意义和话语社区的途径。本文分析了二年级挪威语(L1)课程中的一个识字事件,在这节课上,全班同学就作为家庭作业布置的阅读作业展开了对话。在这个例子中,综合阅读教学的所有要素都得到了体现,这些要素的目标是让学生发展成书面语言、文本意义和话语共同体。然而,这个例子也说明,由于缺乏对口语活动与思维之间联系的认识,将阅读教学要素整合为一个有意义的综合整体的潜力就无法实现。在此背景下,我们讨论了口语和对话活动在挪威和北欧教育研究与实践中的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dialoguing on a Graphic Novel in the Language Learning Classroom with Upper Secondary School Students Att introducera och tillgängliggöra ämnesbegrepp i samhällskunskapsundervisning Læreres oppfatninger om å skrive seg til lesing med digital lydstøtte (STL+) Sambandet mellan läsförståelseresultat i PISA och nationella prov: En fråga om motivation i prov där konsekvenserna är små respektive stora Fagsamtalen under muntlig eksamen og hvilke krav den stiller til elevenes muntlige kompetanse
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1