Other-Regarding or Self-Fulfilling: An Experiment on Working after Disappointment

Jie Liang, Arijit Das, Yinxi Liu, Hui Xu
{"title":"Other-Regarding or Self-Fulfilling: An Experiment on Working after Disappointment","authors":"Jie Liang, Arijit Das, Yinxi Liu, Hui Xu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2180813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is a common sense that an individual would feel disappointed when his work results overpass other team members while his final reward is determined by the poorest performance of the group. One question is raised: How people decide the level of their working effort in the next period while having experienced disappointing feeling in the previous one? In this study, we try to test two hypotheses of the potential impacts of disappoint feeling: disappointment aversion and self-achievement. To do so, we conducted a laboratory experiment by applying a classical repeated minimum effort game under a real effort task at India. We use two different measurements of disappointment to estimate the effort supply of this individual in the next period. The study finds the existence of both the disappointment aversion and self-fulfillment seeking motivation for an individual under different scenarios. The effort supply does depend negatively on the disappoint feeling that has been shortly experienced, proving the motivation of disappoint aversion. Nevertheless, the subject’s motivation of self-achievement will dominate the behavior after having experienced continuously worsening disappointed feeling and therefore, one’s effort supply in the next period does not doomed to rely any more on the performance of one’s team members.","PeriodicalId":299964,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy of Action eJournal","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy of Action eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2180813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

It is a common sense that an individual would feel disappointed when his work results overpass other team members while his final reward is determined by the poorest performance of the group. One question is raised: How people decide the level of their working effort in the next period while having experienced disappointing feeling in the previous one? In this study, we try to test two hypotheses of the potential impacts of disappoint feeling: disappointment aversion and self-achievement. To do so, we conducted a laboratory experiment by applying a classical repeated minimum effort game under a real effort task at India. We use two different measurements of disappointment to estimate the effort supply of this individual in the next period. The study finds the existence of both the disappointment aversion and self-fulfillment seeking motivation for an individual under different scenarios. The effort supply does depend negatively on the disappoint feeling that has been shortly experienced, proving the motivation of disappoint aversion. Nevertheless, the subject’s motivation of self-achievement will dominate the behavior after having experienced continuously worsening disappointed feeling and therefore, one’s effort supply in the next period does not doomed to rely any more on the performance of one’s team members.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考虑他人还是自我实现:失望后的工作实验
当一个人的工作成果超过其他团队成员时,他会感到失望,而他的最终奖励是由团队中最差的表现决定的,这是一个常识。这就提出了一个问题:在经历了上一阶段的失望之后,人们如何决定下一阶段的工作努力程度?在本研究中,我们试图检验失望情绪潜在影响的两个假设:失望厌恶和自我成就。为了做到这一点,我们在印度进行了一个实验室实验,在一个真实的努力任务中应用了一个经典的重复最小努力博弈。我们使用两种不同的失望度量来估计该个体在下一时期的努力供给。研究发现,个体在不同情境下均存在失望厌恶和自我实现寻求动机。努力供给确实负向依赖于刚刚经历的失望感,证明了失望厌恶的动机。然而,在经历了不断恶化的失望情绪后,主体的自我成就动机会主导行为,因此,下一阶段的努力供给不再注定依赖于团队成员的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Experience is (Not) Everything: Sequential Outcomes and Social Decision-Making Zum Praktischen Anwendungsnutzen Der Entscheidungstheorie (About the Practical Application of Decision Theory) Geometric Dispersion Theory for Decisions Under Risk: Accurate Out-of-Sample Predictions and Four Distinct Behavioral Patterns Ambiguity Preferences and Portfolio Choices: Evidence from the Field Expected Comparative Utility Theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1