The effect of matinal active walking on cognitive, fine motor coordination task performances and perceived difficulty in 12-13 young school boys

Elghoul Yousri, Fatma Bahri, Chaari Nesrine, Souissi Nizar, F. Mohamed
{"title":"The effect of matinal active walking on cognitive, fine motor coordination task performances and perceived difficulty in 12-13 young school boys","authors":"Elghoul Yousri, Fatma Bahri, Chaari Nesrine, Souissi Nizar, F. Mohamed","doi":"10.1590/S1980-6574201800040009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"– Aim: The current study examined the relationship between cognitive performances (executive function, selective attention and reaction time), fine motor coordination skills and perceived difficulty after active transport to school. Method: Fifteen right-handed children’s underwent session, 15-min walking session at 30% (WS1) and 15-min walking session (WS2) at 50% of maximal aerobic speed. Subjects performed tests to evaluate executive function, reaction time and selective attention. After each trial, a questionnaire of perceived difficulty (PD) was completed. Results: Average time in TMT part A (F(2,22) = 4.44; p = 0.024; η2= 0.288) and TMT part B (F(2,22) = 4.54; p = 0.022; η2= 0.292), and committed errors (F(2,22) = 7.78; p = 0.003; η2= 0.414) was improved after walking sessions in comparison by CS. The mean scores were significantly higher after walking sessions for both long and short-distance throws (p < 0.05). Moreover, a significant negative correlation was found between committed errors (TMT part B) and both dart throwing consistency and accuracy (r = 0.6; r = 0.64; p < 0.05) (respectively). Post-hoc analysis showed that PD was better after walking sessions with low intensity for both short and long throwing distance. However, it seems that walking session with sustained intensity allows speed and accuracy improvement of cognitive processing. Conclusion: Thus, active walking to school with low intensity was sufficient to produce positives changes in psychomotor performance and decrease in perceived difficulty scores. By including individual differences in gross motor coordination as well as physical activity level, the exact nature of the link between psychomotor skills and cognitive performance could be more addressed.","PeriodicalId":153884,"journal":{"name":"Motriz: Revista de Educação Física","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Motriz: Revista de Educação Física","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-6574201800040009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

– Aim: The current study examined the relationship between cognitive performances (executive function, selective attention and reaction time), fine motor coordination skills and perceived difficulty after active transport to school. Method: Fifteen right-handed children’s underwent session, 15-min walking session at 30% (WS1) and 15-min walking session (WS2) at 50% of maximal aerobic speed. Subjects performed tests to evaluate executive function, reaction time and selective attention. After each trial, a questionnaire of perceived difficulty (PD) was completed. Results: Average time in TMT part A (F(2,22) = 4.44; p = 0.024; η2= 0.288) and TMT part B (F(2,22) = 4.54; p = 0.022; η2= 0.292), and committed errors (F(2,22) = 7.78; p = 0.003; η2= 0.414) was improved after walking sessions in comparison by CS. The mean scores were significantly higher after walking sessions for both long and short-distance throws (p < 0.05). Moreover, a significant negative correlation was found between committed errors (TMT part B) and both dart throwing consistency and accuracy (r = 0.6; r = 0.64; p < 0.05) (respectively). Post-hoc analysis showed that PD was better after walking sessions with low intensity for both short and long throwing distance. However, it seems that walking session with sustained intensity allows speed and accuracy improvement of cognitive processing. Conclusion: Thus, active walking to school with low intensity was sufficient to produce positives changes in psychomotor performance and decrease in perceived difficulty scores. By including individual differences in gross motor coordination as well as physical activity level, the exact nature of the link between psychomotor skills and cognitive performance could be more addressed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
幼儿主动行走对12-13岁男生认知、精细运动协调任务表现和感知困难的影响
-目的:本研究考察了主动交通上学后的认知表现(执行功能、选择性注意和反应时间)、精细运动协调技能和感知困难之间的关系。方法:15名右利手儿童分别以30% (WS1)步行15分钟和以50%最大有氧速度步行15分钟。受试者通过测试来评估执行功能、反应时间和选择性注意。每次试验后,完成一份感知困难问卷(PD)。结果:TMT A部分平均时间(F(2,22) = 4.44;P = 0.024;η2= 0.288), TMT B部分(F(2,22) = 4.54;P = 0.022;η2= 0.292),犯错误(F(2,22) = 7.78;P = 0.003;(η2= 0.414),步行后与CS比较有改善。在长距离和短距离投掷后,平均得分显著提高(p < 0.05)。犯错误(TMT B部分)与掷镖一致性和准确性呈显著负相关(r = 0.6;R = 0.64;P < 0.05)。事后分析显示,无论是短距离还是长距离,在低强度的步行训练后,PD都更好。然而,持续强度的步行似乎可以提高认知处理的速度和准确性。结论:因此,低强度的主动步行上学足以产生精神运动表现的积极变化和感知难度分数的降低。通过将大肌肉运动协调能力和身体活动水平的个体差异包括在内,精神运动技能和认知表现之间联系的确切性质可以得到更多的解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The experience of athletes with disabilities in mainstream sports: an interpretative phenomenological analysis Validity of the Polar V800 heart rate monitor for assessing cardiac autonomic control in individuals with spinal cord injury Normative values of handgrip strength in adolescents according to chronological age and sexual maturation Physiological and technical demands of the small-sided and generic games in female futsal players Monitoring of overtraining and motivation in elite soccer players
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1