Codex Theodosianus 16.2.12 and the Genesis of the Ecclesiastic Privilegium Fori

Almudena Alba López, Raúl González-Salinero
{"title":"Codex Theodosianus 16.2.12 and the Genesis of the Ecclesiastic Privilegium Fori","authors":"Almudena Alba López, Raúl González-Salinero","doi":"10.18573/JLARC.109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The tolerance of the Roman state towards Christianity, which had been established by Constantine in 313, did not entail peace and religious stability for the Empire. The gradual accumulation of competences by bishops through their status as religious specialists as well as their uneasy relationship with political power throughout the increasingly radicalized the Arian-Nicene conflict and led the imperial authorities to adopt a series of legal measures. Those measures aimed at clarifying the status of the episcopate and its relationship with the legal authorities. In this context, the passing of the so-called ecclesiastical privilegium fori attempted to provide an answer to the pleas for legal independence by the bishops. Nevertheless, despite the fact that it was enacted in the context of the Constantinian dynasty granting a series of privileges to the Church, this legal measure, like all others, was not immune to the selfish manipulation of the very same authorities that had passed it.","PeriodicalId":206429,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Late Antique Religion and Culture","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Late Antique Religion and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18573/JLARC.109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The tolerance of the Roman state towards Christianity, which had been established by Constantine in 313, did not entail peace and religious stability for the Empire. The gradual accumulation of competences by bishops through their status as religious specialists as well as their uneasy relationship with political power throughout the increasingly radicalized the Arian-Nicene conflict and led the imperial authorities to adopt a series of legal measures. Those measures aimed at clarifying the status of the episcopate and its relationship with the legal authorities. In this context, the passing of the so-called ecclesiastical privilegium fori attempted to provide an answer to the pleas for legal independence by the bishops. Nevertheless, despite the fact that it was enacted in the context of the Constantinian dynasty granting a series of privileges to the Church, this legal measure, like all others, was not immune to the selfish manipulation of the very same authorities that had passed it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
古抄本Theodosianus 16.2.12和教会特权的起源
君士坦丁在313年建立的罗马政府对基督教的宽容,并没有给帝国带来和平和宗教稳定。主教们通过宗教专家的身份逐渐积累的权力,以及他们与政治权力的不稳定关系,贯穿了日益激进的阿里安-尼西亚冲突,导致帝国当局采取了一系列法律措施。这些措施旨在澄清主教的地位及其与法律当局的关系。在这种情况下,所谓的教会特权法庭的通过试图为主教要求法律独立的请求提供一个答案。然而,尽管它是在君士坦丁王朝授予教会一系列特权的背景下颁布的,但这一法律措施,像所有其他法律措施一样,也不能免受通过它的同一当局的自私操纵。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pseudo-Nilus’s Narrationes: A product of Julian’s Edict against Christian Teachers? The Nestorian treatise preserved in Leontius of Jerusalem's Contra Nestorianos (CPG 6918): Introduction, edition and English translation Somerset, Bannaventa Tabernae, and the Dates of St Patrick From the Fire Temple to the Mosque: the religious urban landscape in Late Antique Ērānšahr Encountering Goddesses in Late Antiquity: Notes on Metamorphoses of Mythic Figures in Religious Storytelling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1