Dark Pools, Fragmented Markets, and the Quality of Price Discovery

R. A. Schwartz
{"title":"Dark Pools, Fragmented Markets, and the Quality of Price Discovery","authors":"R. A. Schwartz","doi":"10.3905/jot.2018.13.4.074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This commentary is on a paper published in 2010. Few would wish to roll the markets back to where they were eight years ago, but have the issues that were debated then been adequately resolved? Are today’s markets acceptably efficient? Can we relax about market quality? My answer to each of these is “no.” What I wrote in 2010, I stand by now. Along with revisiting my previous discussion on dark pools, fragmentation, price discovery, and liquidity, this commentary presents my newer thoughts concerning the definition of the term “liquidity,” and the existence of an illiquidity premium.","PeriodicalId":254660,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Trading","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Trading","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jot.2018.13.4.074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This commentary is on a paper published in 2010. Few would wish to roll the markets back to where they were eight years ago, but have the issues that were debated then been adequately resolved? Are today’s markets acceptably efficient? Can we relax about market quality? My answer to each of these is “no.” What I wrote in 2010, I stand by now. Along with revisiting my previous discussion on dark pools, fragmentation, price discovery, and liquidity, this commentary presents my newer thoughts concerning the definition of the term “liquidity,” and the existence of an illiquidity premium.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
暗池、碎片化市场和价格发现的质量
这篇评论来自于2010年发表的一篇论文。很少有人希望市场回到8年前的水平,但当时辩论的问题是否得到了充分解决?今天的市场是可以接受的有效吗?我们能对市场质量放心吗?我对这些问题的回答都是“不”。我在2010年写的东西,我现在还在坚持。除了回顾我之前关于暗池、碎片化、价格发现和流动性的讨论外,这篇评论还提出了我对“流动性”一词的定义以及非流动性溢价的存在的新想法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Phantom Liquidity and High-Frequency Quoting COMMENTARY: Commentary on “If Best Execution Is a Process, What Does That Process Look Like?”1 Editor’s Letter Machine Learning for Algorithmic Trading and Trade Schedule Optimization COMMENTARY: A Market Structure That Fits the Needs of Portfolio Managers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1