Wittgensteinʼs and Borgesʼ Labyrinth-Imagery

Richard Mcdonough
{"title":"Wittgensteinʼs and Borgesʼ Labyrinth-Imagery","authors":"Richard Mcdonough","doi":"10.30958/AJHA.5-4-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper discusses Wittgensteinʼs labyrinth-imagery in the Philosophical Investigations and Zettel in the light of ancient Greek labyrinth-story of Theseusʼ escape from the labyrinth and Borgesʼlabyrinth-stories. The paper argues that considerable light is shed on several unappreciated dimensions of Wittgensteinʼs later philosophy by these religious and literary labyrinth-stories. The paper argues that Wittgensteinʼs labyrinth-imagery is connected with other important dimensions of his later philosophy, including his imagery of the emergence of linguistic order (meaning) from chaos in paragraph 608 of Zettel, his imagery of philosophy as a journey in Preface to the Philosophical Investigations, his insistence on the need for courage in philosophizing, his view that language arises out of animal instincts, and his Socratic comments that philosophy must be brought \"down to earth.\" It is also argued that whereas an escape from the labyrinth, via \"Ariadneʼs thread,\" is possible in the ancient labyrinth story, Wittgenstein, with Borges and Kafka, holds that no escape from the modern labyrinth is possible. The story of Wittgensteinʼs and Borgesʼ and Kafkaʼs modern labyrinths is more pessimistic than the ancient story. Modern human beings must simply learn to live in the labyrinth. Understanding the literary roots of Wittgensteinʼs labyrinthimagery illuminates his later philosophy and his conception of philosophizing. Although there is no intention to deny Wittgensteinʼs strong links to linguistic or analytical philosophy, the paper argues that Wittgensteinʼs thought is far more informed by the existential concerns of human life than is generally recognized. 1","PeriodicalId":325459,"journal":{"name":"ATHENS JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES & ARTS","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATHENS JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES & ARTS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30958/AJHA.5-4-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The paper discusses Wittgensteinʼs labyrinth-imagery in the Philosophical Investigations and Zettel in the light of ancient Greek labyrinth-story of Theseusʼ escape from the labyrinth and Borgesʼlabyrinth-stories. The paper argues that considerable light is shed on several unappreciated dimensions of Wittgensteinʼs later philosophy by these religious and literary labyrinth-stories. The paper argues that Wittgensteinʼs labyrinth-imagery is connected with other important dimensions of his later philosophy, including his imagery of the emergence of linguistic order (meaning) from chaos in paragraph 608 of Zettel, his imagery of philosophy as a journey in Preface to the Philosophical Investigations, his insistence on the need for courage in philosophizing, his view that language arises out of animal instincts, and his Socratic comments that philosophy must be brought "down to earth." It is also argued that whereas an escape from the labyrinth, via "Ariadneʼs thread," is possible in the ancient labyrinth story, Wittgenstein, with Borges and Kafka, holds that no escape from the modern labyrinth is possible. The story of Wittgensteinʼs and Borgesʼ and Kafkaʼs modern labyrinths is more pessimistic than the ancient story. Modern human beings must simply learn to live in the labyrinth. Understanding the literary roots of Wittgensteinʼs labyrinthimagery illuminates his later philosophy and his conception of philosophizing. Although there is no intention to deny Wittgensteinʼs strong links to linguistic or analytical philosophy, the paper argues that Wittgensteinʼs thought is far more informed by the existential concerns of human life than is generally recognized. 1
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
维特根斯坦和博尔赫斯的迷宫意象
本文结合古希腊忒修斯逃离迷宫的迷宫故事和博尔赫斯的迷宫故事,探讨维特根斯坦《哲学研究》和蔡特尔的迷宫意象。本文认为,这些宗教和文学迷宫般的故事揭示了维特根斯坦后期哲学的几个未被认识的维度。本文认为维特根斯坦的迷宫意象与他后期哲学的其他重要方面有关,包括他在《泽特尔论》第608段中对语言秩序(意义)从混乱中出现的意象,他在《哲学研究序言》中将哲学比喻为一段旅程,他坚持哲学思考需要勇气,他认为语言源于动物本能,他认为这是一个伟大的过程。他的苏格拉底式评论认为哲学必须“脚踏实地”。也有人认为,在古代迷宫故事中,通过“阿里阿德涅的线索”逃离迷宫是可能的,而维特根斯坦与博尔赫斯和卡夫卡认为,逃离现代迷宫是不可能的。维特根斯坦、博尔赫斯和卡夫卡的现代迷宫的故事比古代的故事更悲观。现代人必须学会在迷宫中生活。理解维特根斯坦迷宫意象的文学根源,对维特根斯坦后期的哲学思想和哲学观具有启示意义。虽然本文无意否认维特根斯坦与语言或分析哲学的紧密联系,但本文认为,维特根斯坦的思想远比一般认为的更多地受到人类生活存在主义关注的影响。1
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the Emotional Impact of Environmental Artworks Using Q Methodology Research on Arts and Humanities: A Selected Survey and Works Presented at ATINER’s Annual Humanities and Arts Conferences Current Insights into the Evolution of Cameroon English: The Contribution of the ‘Anglophone Problem’ Some Remarks on the Five Criteria of Democracy Gorgo: Sparta’s Woman of Autonomy, Authority, and Agency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1