COMMUTING TO WORK VERSUS E-COMMUTING: DATA FROM AN AUSTRIAN COMPANY IN PRE-COVID-19 ERA, DURING 1ST LOCKDOWN, AFTER EASING AND DURING 2ND LOCKDOWN

AD ALTA: 11/01 Pub Date : 2021-06-30 DOI:10.33543/11012531
Michal Beno
{"title":"COMMUTING TO WORK VERSUS E-COMMUTING: DATA FROM AN AUSTRIAN COMPANY IN PRE-COVID-19 ERA, DURING 1ST LOCKDOWN, AFTER EASING AND DURING 2ND LOCKDOWN","authors":"Michal Beno","doi":"10.33543/11012531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a result of restrictions introduced to slow the spread of Covid-19, the number of commuters has significantly decreased and e-commuters increased. This analysis is based on Austrians who had a job prior to the pandemic and who were still working during the survey (whether they worked from home or commuted). Using data from the survey, this article examines changes in the mode of workplace of those who switched to e-commuting. Additionally, the authors were interested in finding out to what extent the e-commuting agreement reduces commuting. The following were done: a systematic review of e-commuting literature, a cross-tabulation of data to examine relationships within data, a McNemar test for workplace examination and a Friedman test with pairwise comparisons for commuting analysis. The data show that the number of e-commuters increased in almost all the surveyed periods except between the pre-Covid time and the easing of the lockdown. The e-working proportion increased on average by 59.74%. Results suggest that the frequency of commutes by cubicles differs significantly in all periods except between the first and second lockdowns, and by e-workers between February and the first lockdown and the easing and the second lockdown. If we look at the average rankings, we see that during the second lockdown, the frequency of cubicle commutes decreased significantly and that of e-workers increased.","PeriodicalId":316290,"journal":{"name":"AD ALTA: 11/01","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AD ALTA: 11/01","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33543/11012531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

As a result of restrictions introduced to slow the spread of Covid-19, the number of commuters has significantly decreased and e-commuters increased. This analysis is based on Austrians who had a job prior to the pandemic and who were still working during the survey (whether they worked from home or commuted). Using data from the survey, this article examines changes in the mode of workplace of those who switched to e-commuting. Additionally, the authors were interested in finding out to what extent the e-commuting agreement reduces commuting. The following were done: a systematic review of e-commuting literature, a cross-tabulation of data to examine relationships within data, a McNemar test for workplace examination and a Friedman test with pairwise comparisons for commuting analysis. The data show that the number of e-commuters increased in almost all the surveyed periods except between the pre-Covid time and the easing of the lockdown. The e-working proportion increased on average by 59.74%. Results suggest that the frequency of commutes by cubicles differs significantly in all periods except between the first and second lockdowns, and by e-workers between February and the first lockdown and the easing and the second lockdown. If we look at the average rankings, we see that during the second lockdown, the frequency of cubicle commutes decreased significantly and that of e-workers increased.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通勤上班与电子通勤:来自奥地利一家公司在2019冠状病毒病前、第一次封锁期间、放松后和第二次封锁期间的数据
由于为减缓Covid-19的传播而采取的限制措施,通勤者人数大幅减少,电子通勤者增加。这项分析是基于在大流行之前有工作并且在调查期间仍在工作的奥地利人(无论他们是在家工作还是通勤)。本文利用调查数据,研究了那些转向电子通勤的人在工作场所模式上的变化。此外,作者对电子通勤协议在多大程度上减少通勤感兴趣。我们做了以下工作:对电子通勤文献进行系统回顾,对数据进行交叉列表以检验数据之间的关系,对工作场所检查进行McNemar检验,对通勤分析进行弗里德曼检验,进行两两比较。数据显示,除了新冠肺炎前和解除封锁之间,几乎所有调查期间,电子通勤者的数量都在增加。电子办公比例平均增长59.74%。结果表明,除第一次和第二次封城期间外,所有时期的隔间通勤频率都有显著差异,2月至第一次封城期间以及放松和第二次封城期间,电子工作者的通勤频率也有显著差异。如果我们看一下平均排名,我们会发现,在第二次封城期间,隔间通勤的频率显著下降,而电子工作者的频率增加了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MODIFICATION OF THE COMPARATIVE VALUATION METHOD FOR VALUATION OF A SET OF REAL ESTATE WITH AN INSUFFICIENTLY LARGE BATTERY OF COMPARABLE PROPERTY INTENSITY OF INNOVATION ACTIVITY AND ITS PROGRESSIVITY IN ENTERPRISES IN SLOVAKIA IN THE ERA OF INDUSTRY 4.0 THE IMPACT OF MACROECONOMIC INDICATORS ON VAT REVENUES IN EU COUNTRIES ANALYSIS OF DEMAND FOR COUNSELLING SERVICES FOR UNIVERSITY / COLLEGE STUDENTS ORIGINS OF MEDICAL EDUCATION ON THE TERRITORY OF MODERN UKRAINE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1