Election petition and the future of electoral reforms in Ghana

Ransford Edward van Gyampo, A. Agbevade, E. Graham
{"title":"Election petition and the future of electoral reforms in Ghana","authors":"Ransford Edward van Gyampo, A. Agbevade, E. Graham","doi":"10.20940/jae/2022/v21i1a6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The results of Ghana’s 2012 and 2020 elections were challenged in the nation’s Supreme Court. Even though the court processes in both cases did not alter the election results, they nevertheless exposed monumental flaws in the electoral processes. The flaws in the 2012 electoral processes were exposed at the Supreme Court and featured in the final judgment of the court in a manner that allowed the Electoral Commission to initiate moves towards electoral reforms. However, the challenges of the 2020 elections, though exposed at the courts, were never featured in the final judgment of the Supreme Court. This paper discusses the implications of the 2020 election petition for the future of electoral reforms in Ghana. It argues that the rigid application of the letter of the law by the Supreme Court and the relegation to the background of the thorny issues of electoral challenges in the 2020 elections, would render the quest for further electoral reforms difficult. This would then make the future of any attempt to fine-tune the electoral processes quite bleak.","PeriodicalId":159701,"journal":{"name":"Journal of African Elections","volume":"61 21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of African Elections","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20940/jae/2022/v21i1a6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The results of Ghana’s 2012 and 2020 elections were challenged in the nation’s Supreme Court. Even though the court processes in both cases did not alter the election results, they nevertheless exposed monumental flaws in the electoral processes. The flaws in the 2012 electoral processes were exposed at the Supreme Court and featured in the final judgment of the court in a manner that allowed the Electoral Commission to initiate moves towards electoral reforms. However, the challenges of the 2020 elections, though exposed at the courts, were never featured in the final judgment of the Supreme Court. This paper discusses the implications of the 2020 election petition for the future of electoral reforms in Ghana. It argues that the rigid application of the letter of the law by the Supreme Court and the relegation to the background of the thorny issues of electoral challenges in the 2020 elections, would render the quest for further electoral reforms difficult. This would then make the future of any attempt to fine-tune the electoral processes quite bleak.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加纳选举请愿与选举改革的未来
加纳2012年和2020年的选举结果在该国最高法院受到质疑。尽管这两起案件的法庭程序都没有改变选举结果,但它们暴露了选举过程中的重大缺陷。2012年选举过程中的缺陷在最高法院暴露出来,并在法院的最终判决中得以体现,从而使选举委员会得以启动选举改革的行动。但是,虽然在法庭上暴露了2020年选举的挑战,但在大法院的最终判决中却没有体现出来。本文讨论了2020年选举请愿书对加纳选举改革未来的影响。它认为,最高法院对法律条文的严格适用以及将2020年选举挑战的棘手问题置于背景之下,将使寻求进一步的选举改革变得困难。这将使任何试图调整选举进程的未来变得相当黯淡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impact of intra-party conflicts on the electoral performance of the All Basotho convention in Lesotho’s 2022 elections Book review: Politics, government and governance in Lesotho since 1993 Francis K. Makoa The transition and formation of government after Lesotho’s 2022 elections Reasons for the low voter turnout in Lesotho’s 2022 elections Screening political party candidates and the implications for electoral performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1