Choosing between the UN and OECD Tax Policy Models: An African Case Study

Veronika Daurer, R. Krever
{"title":"Choosing between the UN and OECD Tax Policy Models: An African Case Study","authors":"Veronika Daurer, R. Krever","doi":"10.3366/AJICL.2014.0077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reports on a study of the tax treaty policy of a group of eleven East African countries. African tax treaties tend to follow one of two model treaties, an OECD model treaty that favours the interests of capital exporting nations and a United Nations model treaty that allows capital importing countries to retain more taxing rights. The study compares the policy outcomes in treaties signed by these countries with African nations, with relatively wealthy OECD countries, and with non-African countries that are not members of the OECD. It also compares selected outcomes in African–OECD treaties with those results in treaties between a group of Asian countries and OECD members to see whether African countries have been more or less successful at wringing preferences from wealthier nations. The study suggests the African countries studied have not been as successful in retaining taxing rights in treaties with OECD countries as have Asian countries. On the other hand, OECD countries are often more generous to African countries than are other African countries.","PeriodicalId":105680,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Taxation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Taxation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/AJICL.2014.0077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

This paper reports on a study of the tax treaty policy of a group of eleven East African countries. African tax treaties tend to follow one of two model treaties, an OECD model treaty that favours the interests of capital exporting nations and a United Nations model treaty that allows capital importing countries to retain more taxing rights. The study compares the policy outcomes in treaties signed by these countries with African nations, with relatively wealthy OECD countries, and with non-African countries that are not members of the OECD. It also compares selected outcomes in African–OECD treaties with those results in treaties between a group of Asian countries and OECD members to see whether African countries have been more or less successful at wringing preferences from wealthier nations. The study suggests the African countries studied have not been as successful in retaining taxing rights in treaties with OECD countries as have Asian countries. On the other hand, OECD countries are often more generous to African countries than are other African countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
联合国和经合组织税收政策模式的选择:一个非洲案例研究
本文对十一个东非国家的税收协定政策进行了研究。非洲税收协定往往遵循两个示范条约之一,一个是有利于资本输出国利益的经合组织示范条约,另一个是允许资本输入国保留更多征税权的联合国示范条约。这项研究比较了这些国家与非洲国家、相对富裕的经合组织国家以及非经合组织成员的非非洲国家签署的条约的政策结果。它还将非洲-经合组织条约的某些结果与一组亚洲国家和经合组织成员国之间条约的结果进行比较,以了解非洲国家在争取较富裕国家的优惠方面是否取得了或多或少的成功。该研究表明,所研究的非洲国家在与经合组织国家签订的条约中保留征税权方面并不像亚洲国家那样成功。另一方面,经合组织国家对非洲国家往往比其他非洲国家更慷慨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Goods and Services Tax (GST) impact on Indian Automobile Industry The Impact of the COVID-19 Shock on Labour Income Inequality: Evidence from Italy The German Business Panel: Insights on Corporate Taxation and Accounting during the COVID-19 Pandemic Supporting Carbon Taxes: The Role of Fairness Protectionism and the Effective Lower Bound in the Euro Area
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1