Małżeństwo a odpowiedzialność. Socjologiczno-prawna analiza rozwodów w Polsce

Ewa Markowska-Gos
{"title":"Małżeństwo a odpowiedzialność. Socjologiczno-prawna analiza rozwodów w Polsce","authors":"Ewa Markowska-Gos","doi":"10.15584/kpe.2022.11.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We are currently living in Poland in a liberal society with a certain level of subjectivity of individuals, which translates, for example, into freedom of: speech, conscience and religion, lifestyle. This is reflected in the sphere of family life. We function in marriages, cohabiting relationships or as singles. Marriage, no matter how it is understood, is of considerable importance from the perspective of the individual, his family and society. It is incomparable to the social significance of the above-mentioned so-called alternative forms of family life. This significance is evidenced by the fact that it is reflected in the regulations of secular and canon law. They form an essentially similar, normatively determined cultural pattern for implementation in social reality. In this connection, the essence of marriage in both areas of law is discussed. Both in the Family and Guardianship Code and in canon law, nupturients enter into marriage on the basis of a contract. However, individuals are more and more often, for various reasons, unwilling or not strong-willed enough to fulfil it at all or to meet some of its conditions, as evidenced by the increase in the number of divorces in Poland. This has inspired the author of this publication to make an attempt to undertake a socio-legal analysis of the issue of responsibility for a marriage (or lack of it) in Polish society based on the grounds for divorce and the so-called “breaking obstacles” as legal grounds for marriage annulment, assuming as lack of responsibility the criterion of guilt, i.e. bad will of the partner (sometimes both partners). Furthermore, it should be emphasised that divorce itself or the annulment of a marriage could be considered irresponsible failure to comply with the aforementioned consensus. It is therefore necessary here to cite the age-old Roman law principle ‘contracts must be honoured’.","PeriodicalId":339622,"journal":{"name":"Kultura - Przemiany - Edukacja","volume":"13 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kultura - Przemiany - Edukacja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15584/kpe.2022.11.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We are currently living in Poland in a liberal society with a certain level of subjectivity of individuals, which translates, for example, into freedom of: speech, conscience and religion, lifestyle. This is reflected in the sphere of family life. We function in marriages, cohabiting relationships or as singles. Marriage, no matter how it is understood, is of considerable importance from the perspective of the individual, his family and society. It is incomparable to the social significance of the above-mentioned so-called alternative forms of family life. This significance is evidenced by the fact that it is reflected in the regulations of secular and canon law. They form an essentially similar, normatively determined cultural pattern for implementation in social reality. In this connection, the essence of marriage in both areas of law is discussed. Both in the Family and Guardianship Code and in canon law, nupturients enter into marriage on the basis of a contract. However, individuals are more and more often, for various reasons, unwilling or not strong-willed enough to fulfil it at all or to meet some of its conditions, as evidenced by the increase in the number of divorces in Poland. This has inspired the author of this publication to make an attempt to undertake a socio-legal analysis of the issue of responsibility for a marriage (or lack of it) in Polish society based on the grounds for divorce and the so-called “breaking obstacles” as legal grounds for marriage annulment, assuming as lack of responsibility the criterion of guilt, i.e. bad will of the partner (sometimes both partners). Furthermore, it should be emphasised that divorce itself or the annulment of a marriage could be considered irresponsible failure to comply with the aforementioned consensus. It is therefore necessary here to cite the age-old Roman law principle ‘contracts must be honoured’.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们目前生活在波兰的一个自由社会中,个人有一定程度的主体性,例如,这转化为言论、良心和宗教、生活方式的自由。这反映在家庭生活领域。我们在婚姻、同居关系或单身中发挥作用。无论如何理解婚姻,从个人、家庭和社会的角度来看,都是相当重要的。它的社会意义是无法与上述所谓的家庭生活的替代形式相比的。这一意义是由事实证明,它是反映在世俗法规和教会法。它们在社会现实中形成了本质上相似的、规范决定的文化模式。在这方面,婚姻在这两个法律领域的本质进行了讨论。在《家庭和监护法》和教会法中,新人都是在合同的基础上结婚的。但是,由于各种原因,个人越来越经常不愿意或没有足够的意志来履行《公约》或满足其中的一些条件,波兰离婚人数的增加就是明证。这促使本出版物的作者试图根据离婚的理由和所谓的“打破障碍”作为解除婚姻的法律理由,对波兰社会的婚姻责任(或缺乏婚姻责任)问题进行社会-法律分析,并假定有罪的标准,即伴侣(有时是双方)的不良意愿。此外,应当强调的是,离婚本身或婚姻的废除可被视为不负责任,未能遵守上述协商一致意见。因此,有必要在这里引用古老的罗马法原则“合同必须遵守”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Zaburzenia relacji społecznych osób z zespołem Aspergera jako konsekwencja deficytów lingwistycznych w oparciu o analizę zachowań językowych Ciągłość czy zmiana? O powojennym systemie kształcenia nauczycieli na przykładzie województwa śląsko-dąbrowskiego Zdalna pomoc psychologiczno-pedagogiczna dla uczniów z niepełnosprawnością intelektualną w opiniach specjalistów Harmonization of pedagogical theory and methodological knowledge as an important constituent of qualitative professional training of future teachers Samoocena i samowiedza uczniów wczesnej edukacji w opinii nauczycieli
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1