The Great Wall of Turkey: From „The Open-Door Policy” to Building Fortress?

Barbora Olejárová
{"title":"The Great Wall of Turkey: From „The Open-Door Policy” to Building Fortress?","authors":"Barbora Olejárová","doi":"10.25167/ppbs55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following outbreak of the Syrian civil war in 2011, Turkey recorded an unprecedented inflow of migrants from its southern neighbourhood. The policy of opened borders in the initial years of war contrasted to securitization, the search for international support and other similar policies, which countries usually adopt in cases of migration crises. However, rising numbers of Syrian migrants, the deterioration of Turkish relations with the Assad government and the engagement of the Kurds as another important party in the Syrian conflict resulted in the switch of the Turkish border policy. In 2014, President Erdoğan initiated the construction of over 800 km long barrier on the border with Syria with an aim to build similar fenced walls on the Iraqi and Iranian border in 2017. Main aim of this paper is to analyze the development of the Turkish border policy (particularly concerning the border with Syria) in the aftermath of the 2011 events in the Middle East and identify factors, which led up to the shift from the policy of welcoming to the policy of building „Fortress Turkey”. The first part of the paper will briefly summarize Turkish migration policy and focus on presenting the change of the initial ‘open’ approach to migration from Syria into the current state of building fences in the borderland. Subsequently, the paper will deal with selected factors, which might have caused this phenomenon. These include spread of terrorism and inflow of the Daesh fighters, who were using soft border regime to diffuse their activities to the Turkish territory; increase in smuggling and cross-border illegal trade; fears from the conflict spillover; but also territorial integrity concerns with regard to revival of the Kurdish activities in the region .","PeriodicalId":431553,"journal":{"name":"Pogranicze. Polish Borderlands Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pogranicze. Polish Borderlands Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25167/ppbs55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Following outbreak of the Syrian civil war in 2011, Turkey recorded an unprecedented inflow of migrants from its southern neighbourhood. The policy of opened borders in the initial years of war contrasted to securitization, the search for international support and other similar policies, which countries usually adopt in cases of migration crises. However, rising numbers of Syrian migrants, the deterioration of Turkish relations with the Assad government and the engagement of the Kurds as another important party in the Syrian conflict resulted in the switch of the Turkish border policy. In 2014, President Erdoğan initiated the construction of over 800 km long barrier on the border with Syria with an aim to build similar fenced walls on the Iraqi and Iranian border in 2017. Main aim of this paper is to analyze the development of the Turkish border policy (particularly concerning the border with Syria) in the aftermath of the 2011 events in the Middle East and identify factors, which led up to the shift from the policy of welcoming to the policy of building „Fortress Turkey”. The first part of the paper will briefly summarize Turkish migration policy and focus on presenting the change of the initial ‘open’ approach to migration from Syria into the current state of building fences in the borderland. Subsequently, the paper will deal with selected factors, which might have caused this phenomenon. These include spread of terrorism and inflow of the Daesh fighters, who were using soft border regime to diffuse their activities to the Turkish territory; increase in smuggling and cross-border illegal trade; fears from the conflict spillover; but also territorial integrity concerns with regard to revival of the Kurdish activities in the region .
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土耳其长城:从“开放政策”到筑堡垒?
2011年叙利亚内战爆发后,土耳其记录了来自其南部邻国的前所未有的移民流入。战争初期开放边界的政策与证券化、寻求国际支持和其他类似政策形成对比,这些政策通常是各国在移民危机时采取的。然而,随着叙利亚移民人数的增加,土耳其与阿萨德政府关系的恶化,以及库尔德人作为叙利亚冲突的另一个重要当事方的参与,导致土耳其边境政策的转变。2014年,总统Erdoğan开始在与叙利亚的边界上建造800多公里长的屏障,目的是在2017年在伊拉克和伊朗边境建造类似的围栏墙。本文的主要目的是分析2011年中东事件后土耳其边境政策(特别是与叙利亚接壤的边境)的发展,并确定导致从欢迎政策转向建设“土耳其堡垒”政策的因素。本文的第一部分将简要总结土耳其的移民政策,并重点介绍从叙利亚移民到目前在边境修建围栏的初始“开放”方法的变化。随后,本文将选择可能导致这种现象的因素进行处理。其中包括恐怖主义的蔓延和Daesh武装分子的流入,他们利用软边界制度将活动扩散到土耳其领土;走私和跨境非法贸易增加;对冲突外溢的担忧;而且领土完整也涉及到该地区库尔德人活动的恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Polish local democracy in crisis? Non-competitive elections and the supply of candidates for councillors The borders of the European Union in the context of the States’ response to the pandemic threat and the legal framework for the actions taken Using Technology to Address Cross Border Crime and Illegal Migration: The Case of South Africa Border-crossings as memory sites? The case study of the Czech-Polish border in Cieszyn Silesia Gendered Inequalities in Ethnic Enclaves: Labour Insertion of Bolivian Aymara Women in Northern Chilean Borderlands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1