On the Impulse in Impulse Learning

J. Ding, A. Nicklisch
{"title":"On the Impulse in Impulse Learning","authors":"J. Ding, A. Nicklisch","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2226362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper experimentally investigates the nature of impulses in impulse learning. Particularly, we analyze whether positive feedback (i.e., yielding a superior payoff in a game) or negative feedback (i.e., yielding an inferior payoff in a game) leads to a systematic change in the individual choices. The results reveal that subjects predominantly learn from negative feedback.","PeriodicalId":299964,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy of Action eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy of Action eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2226362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This paper experimentally investigates the nature of impulses in impulse learning. Particularly, we analyze whether positive feedback (i.e., yielding a superior payoff in a game) or negative feedback (i.e., yielding an inferior payoff in a game) leads to a systematic change in the individual choices. The results reveal that subjects predominantly learn from negative feedback.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论冲动学习中的冲动
本文通过实验研究了冲动学习中冲动的本质。特别是,我们分析了积极反馈(游戏邦注:即在游戏中产生更高的收益)或消极反馈(游戏邦注:即在游戏中产生更低的收益)是否会导致个体选择的系统性变化。结果显示,受试者主要从负面反馈中学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Experience is (Not) Everything: Sequential Outcomes and Social Decision-Making Zum Praktischen Anwendungsnutzen Der Entscheidungstheorie (About the Practical Application of Decision Theory) Geometric Dispersion Theory for Decisions Under Risk: Accurate Out-of-Sample Predictions and Four Distinct Behavioral Patterns Ambiguity Preferences and Portfolio Choices: Evidence from the Field Expected Comparative Utility Theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1