A Note on the Drivers of R&D Intensity

A. Mathieu, Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie
{"title":"A Note on the Drivers of R&D Intensity","authors":"A. Mathieu, Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie","doi":"10.5430/RWE.V1N1P56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this paper is to evaluate the extent to which technological specialization influences the observed R&D intensity of countries, and hence would bias the well-known country rankings that consist in comparing aggregate R&D intensity. The econometric analysis performed on a cross-country cross-industry panel dataset (21 industrial sectors, 10 countries, from 1991 to 2002) suggests that accounting for the technological specialization of countries drastically reduces the differences in relative R&D efforts observed at the country level. The only exception is Sweden (and the USA, but to a lower extent), which has an ‘above-than-average’ R&D intensity in most industries. Countries like Finland, Japan or Germany do not have an R&D intensity that is particularly higher than their industrial structure would predict.","PeriodicalId":401540,"journal":{"name":"CEPR: Industrial Organization (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"78","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CEPR: Industrial Organization (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/RWE.V1N1P56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 78

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to evaluate the extent to which technological specialization influences the observed R&D intensity of countries, and hence would bias the well-known country rankings that consist in comparing aggregate R&D intensity. The econometric analysis performed on a cross-country cross-industry panel dataset (21 industrial sectors, 10 countries, from 1991 to 2002) suggests that accounting for the technological specialization of countries drastically reduces the differences in relative R&D efforts observed at the country level. The only exception is Sweden (and the USA, but to a lower extent), which has an ‘above-than-average’ R&D intensity in most industries. Countries like Finland, Japan or Germany do not have an R&D intensity that is particularly higher than their industrial structure would predict.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研发强度驱动因素研究述评
本文的目的是评估技术专业化对观察到的各国研发强度的影响程度,从而使比较总研发强度的知名国家排名产生偏差。对跨国跨行业面板数据集(1991年至2002年,10个国家的21个工业部门)进行的计量经济学分析表明,考虑到各国的技术专业化,大大减少了在国家一级观察到的相对研发努力的差异。唯一的例外是瑞典(以及美国,但程度较低),它在大多数行业的研发强度都“高于平均水平”。芬兰、日本或德国等国的研发强度并没有特别高于其产业结构所能预测的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bias in Expert Product Reviews Reverse Bayesianism: Revising Beliefs in Light of Unforeseen Events Price Floors and Externality Correction Personal Values and Cyber Risk-Taking Signaling, Random Assignment, and Causal Effect Estimation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1