Revolutionizing Learning Environments with Guerrilla Pedagogy in Large Classes

V. Manokore, Doug McRae
{"title":"Revolutionizing Learning Environments with Guerrilla Pedagogy in Large Classes","authors":"V. Manokore, Doug McRae","doi":"10.29173/jpnep7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Engaging students in large classes can be challenging for educators. In this study, we implemented a guerrilla tactic in an effort to engage our students. Guerilla tactic is a pedagogical approach where one teacher (the “guerrilla”) enters into a colleague’s class that is in session, sits for a while, takes over the teaching for about ten minutes, then leaves the classroom. There is an element of student surprise with guerrilla pedagogy because students are not informed in advance about the guerrilla visit and the host instructor has no prior knowledge on what the visiting guerrilla instructor would talk about. For this study, two practical nursing instructors who teach the same courses (i.e., anatomy and physiology, and pathophysiology) to different sections collaborated as guerrilla instructors. Four sections of students; two from anatomy and physiology and two from pathophysiology participated in the study. Each section had about one hundred students. The disruptive guerrilla pedagogy was implemented during the 2019 winter semester. At the end of the semester, students completed a survey about their experiences that had both Likert scale and open-ended questions. The instructors critically reflected on their experiences. Thematic analysis and descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. Overall, students and the instructors had positive experiences with the instructional strategy. In our reflective analysis, we answer Hutchings's (2000) taxonomy of scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) inquiry questions. We found that students appreciated being exposed to two experts who have different instructional strategies. Educators have to trust and respect their peers in ways that allow them to be vulnerable and enhance their practice. The surprise and instructor collaboration brought by guerrilla pedagogy enhanced students’ engagement in large classes.","PeriodicalId":254229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Practical Nurse Education and Practice","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Practical Nurse Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/jpnep7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Engaging students in large classes can be challenging for educators. In this study, we implemented a guerrilla tactic in an effort to engage our students. Guerilla tactic is a pedagogical approach where one teacher (the “guerrilla”) enters into a colleague’s class that is in session, sits for a while, takes over the teaching for about ten minutes, then leaves the classroom. There is an element of student surprise with guerrilla pedagogy because students are not informed in advance about the guerrilla visit and the host instructor has no prior knowledge on what the visiting guerrilla instructor would talk about. For this study, two practical nursing instructors who teach the same courses (i.e., anatomy and physiology, and pathophysiology) to different sections collaborated as guerrilla instructors. Four sections of students; two from anatomy and physiology and two from pathophysiology participated in the study. Each section had about one hundred students. The disruptive guerrilla pedagogy was implemented during the 2019 winter semester. At the end of the semester, students completed a survey about their experiences that had both Likert scale and open-ended questions. The instructors critically reflected on their experiences. Thematic analysis and descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. Overall, students and the instructors had positive experiences with the instructional strategy. In our reflective analysis, we answer Hutchings's (2000) taxonomy of scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) inquiry questions. We found that students appreciated being exposed to two experts who have different instructional strategies. Educators have to trust and respect their peers in ways that allow them to be vulnerable and enhance their practice. The surprise and instructor collaboration brought by guerrilla pedagogy enhanced students’ engagement in large classes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用游击教学法革新大班学习环境
对教育工作者来说,让学生参与大班教学是一项挑战。在这项研究中,我们采用了一种游击战术来吸引学生。游击战术是一种教学方法,一名教师(“游击”)进入正在上课的同事的班级,坐一会儿,接管教学大约十分钟,然后离开教室。游击式教学法有一个让学生感到惊讶的因素,因为学生没有事先被告知游击式的访问,而东道主教师也不知道游击式的访问教师会说些什么。在本研究中,两名在不同科室教授相同课程(即解剖生理学和病理生理学)的实践护理指导员作为游击指导员合作。四节学生;两名来自解剖学和生理学,两名来自病理生理学参与了这项研究。每个小组大约有100名学生。这种颠覆性的游击教学法在2019年冬季学期实施。在学期结束时,学生们完成了一份关于他们经历的调查,包括李克特量表和开放式问题。教师们批判性地反思他们的经历。采用专题分析和描述性统计对数据进行分析。总体而言,学生和教师对教学策略有积极的体验。在我们的反思分析中,我们回答了Hutchings(2000)的教学与学习(SoTL)研究性问题的学术分类。我们发现,学生们很乐意接触到两位有着不同教学策略的专家。教育工作者必须信任和尊重他们的同龄人,允许他们脆弱,并加强他们的实践。游击教学法带来的惊喜和教师的合作提高了学生在大班中的参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Developing an LPN Transition to Practice Program to Support the Changing Nursing Landscape Relation-intersectional Ethics Trestle: A Harmonious Merging of Relational Ethics and Intersectionality An Educator’s Reflection on the exploration of the ethical issues of Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) with Nursing and Healthcare Students Teaching Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Topics – Challenges and Rewards, a Reflection from a Nursing Professor Exploring Nurses’ and Nursing Students' Self- Efficacy and Mindsets in Caring for the Elderly in Canada.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1