A Study of Pragmatic Stylistic Features of Reading Comprehension Texts in College English Test Band-4: Taking the Texts in December 2021 as an Example

Heting Zhai
{"title":"A Study of Pragmatic Stylistic Features of Reading Comprehension Texts in College English Test Band-4: Taking the Texts in December 2021 as an Example","authors":"Heting Zhai","doi":"10.56397/jare.2023.03.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As one important test of English proficiency during college in China, CET-4 has long focused on examining students’ reading ability since it started. To probe a nerve of it, this paper is lighted by the framework of pragmatic stylistics, combining ways of Black’s signposts and Read’s stylistic list. From the perspective of structure, vocabulary, and grammar, the pragmatic stylistic features of reading comprehension texts in CET-4 in December 2021 are thus analyzed. The results show that argumentative essays are structured on the author’s opinion while expository essays are on the knowledge; at the vocabulary level, expository essays prefer to employ more diversely while argumentative essays tend to be more balanced in difficulty; at the grammatical level, these two types of texts both use object and adverbial clauses, and they choose simple present and past simple tenses. Also, their sentences are favored active voice.","PeriodicalId":148547,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Research in Education","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Research in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56397/jare.2023.03.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As one important test of English proficiency during college in China, CET-4 has long focused on examining students’ reading ability since it started. To probe a nerve of it, this paper is lighted by the framework of pragmatic stylistics, combining ways of Black’s signposts and Read’s stylistic list. From the perspective of structure, vocabulary, and grammar, the pragmatic stylistic features of reading comprehension texts in CET-4 in December 2021 are thus analyzed. The results show that argumentative essays are structured on the author’s opinion while expository essays are on the knowledge; at the vocabulary level, expository essays prefer to employ more diversely while argumentative essays tend to be more balanced in difficulty; at the grammatical level, these two types of texts both use object and adverbial clauses, and they choose simple present and past simple tenses. Also, their sentences are favored active voice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学英语四级阅读理解篇章的语用风格特征研究——以2021年12月的篇章为例
作为中国大学英语水平的一项重要测试,大学英语四级考试自推出以来一直侧重于测试学生的阅读能力。本文在语用文体学的框架下,结合布莱克的“路标”和里德的“文体表”的方法,探讨了这一问题。从结构、词汇和语法三个方面分析了2021年12月英语四级阅读理解试题的语用风格特征。结果表明:议论文以作者的观点为结构,说明文以作者的知识为结构;在词汇水平上,说明文倾向于使用更多样化,而议论文往往在难度上更平衡;在语法层面上,这两种类型的文本都使用宾语从句和状语从句,并选择一般现在时和一般过去时。而且,他们的句子更喜欢主动语态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
School Reforms for Low-Income Students Under Conflict Theory The Relationship Between Family Educational Inputs and Middle School Students’ Academic Achievement: A Moderated Mediated Effects Analysis Role of Information, Education, Communication and Training in Disaster Management How to Integrate the Concept of Deep Teaching into the Teaching of Values in Moral Education Course Designing a Proposed Program Based on Artificial Intelligence Applications and Measuring Its Effectiveness in Developing the Positive Thinking Skills of Kindergarten Children
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1