Imperatives of complementary development in agrosphere

O. Borodina
{"title":"Imperatives of complementary development in agrosphere","authors":"O. Borodina","doi":"10.15407/eip2017.04.125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern vector of agriculture policy development in leading countries is oriented to complementary characteristics of agro-food systems, where production of actual and public goods are combined. Taking into account the complementary nature of connections between agriculture and rural developments, specific policy regulations and financial instruments are used in order to keep the proper balance. For transition to such policy-making in Ukrainian realities, it makes sense to start using the term \"agrosphere\" as a united subject of state regulation and state financial support instead of the currently used term \"agro-industrial complex\" or agrarian sector. Introduction of the term of agrosphere in the policy-making process would ensure that regulation is made for a multi-level and multi-functional system, covering social, economic and environmental aspects, directly connected with food self-fulfillment and export potential fulfillment. Complementarity in agrosphere development is envisioned as inter-connection between agriculture and rural area, under which, as a result of their cooperation, effectiveness of the production, and welfare of rural population increase and broad recovery of production resources is ensured in a certain territory. Transition to complementary development of agrosphere consists in the introduction of the new system of state regulation, which can protect traditional agriculture and village based on public understanding of their complementary nature and form general opposition to the current state of relations between agro-business, natural resources and rural communities. This would require significant public expenditures (first of all financial), involvement of socially responsible private investments and environmentally safe technologies, and specific political instruments, in particular science-based socioeconomic planning on the national level.","PeriodicalId":212761,"journal":{"name":"Economy and Forecasting","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economy and Forecasting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2017.04.125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Modern vector of agriculture policy development in leading countries is oriented to complementary characteristics of agro-food systems, where production of actual and public goods are combined. Taking into account the complementary nature of connections between agriculture and rural developments, specific policy regulations and financial instruments are used in order to keep the proper balance. For transition to such policy-making in Ukrainian realities, it makes sense to start using the term "agrosphere" as a united subject of state regulation and state financial support instead of the currently used term "agro-industrial complex" or agrarian sector. Introduction of the term of agrosphere in the policy-making process would ensure that regulation is made for a multi-level and multi-functional system, covering social, economic and environmental aspects, directly connected with food self-fulfillment and export potential fulfillment. Complementarity in agrosphere development is envisioned as inter-connection between agriculture and rural area, under which, as a result of their cooperation, effectiveness of the production, and welfare of rural population increase and broad recovery of production resources is ensured in a certain territory. Transition to complementary development of agrosphere consists in the introduction of the new system of state regulation, which can protect traditional agriculture and village based on public understanding of their complementary nature and form general opposition to the current state of relations between agro-business, natural resources and rural communities. This would require significant public expenditures (first of all financial), involvement of socially responsible private investments and environmentally safe technologies, and specific political instruments, in particular science-based socioeconomic planning on the national level.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农业圈互补发展的必要性
在主要国家,农业政策发展的现代媒介是面向农业粮食系统的互补特征,在这些系统中,实际产品和公共产品的生产相结合。考虑到农业与农村发展之间联系的互补性,为了保持适当的平衡,使用了具体的政策法规和金融工具。为了在乌克兰的现实中过渡到这样的政策制定,开始使用术语“农业圈”作为国家监管和国家财政支持的统一主体,而不是目前使用的术语“农业-工业综合体”或农业部门是有意义的。在决策过程中引入农业圈一词将确保为一个多层次和多功能系统制定规章,该系统涵盖与粮食自我实现和出口潜力实现直接相关的社会、经济和环境方面。农业圈发展的互补性被设想为农业和农村地区之间的相互联系,在这种联系下,由于它们的合作,生产的有效性和农村人口的福利在一定领土内得到增加和生产资源的广泛恢复。向农业圈互补性发展的过渡包括引入新的国家监管制度,该制度可以在公众了解其互补性的基础上保护传统农业和村庄,并形成对农业企业、自然资源和农村社区之间关系现状的普遍反对。这将需要大量的公共支出(首先是财政支出),对社会负责的私人投资和对环境安全的技术的参与,以及具体的政治工具,特别是国家一级以科学为基础的社会经济规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Science and innovation in Ukraine: approaches to policy making in times of war REGULATION OF UKRAINE’S COMMODITY MARKETS IN CONDITIONS OF EMERGENCY AND MARTIAL LAW A RHYMED CHRONICLE OF THE WAR UKRAINE’S POST-WAR ECONOMY: INTERNATIONAL AID AND GROWTH POLICY STRATEGIES OF ECONOMIC STABILITY IN UNSTABLE ENVIRONMENT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1