Comparison between FLC and PID controller for speed control of DC motor

Abdel-Azim S. Abdel-Salam
{"title":"Comparison between FLC and PID controller for speed control of DC motor","authors":"Abdel-Azim S. Abdel-Salam","doi":"10.15406/iratj.2022.08.00242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The conventional PID controller is very good when all parameters of the system are Known, that’s mean the system is linear, but when the system is nonlinear because of the friction, the saturation, the disturbance, or the load the dynamic model of the system will be the change, in this case, the conventional PID controller is not good, therefore we used the FLC because it is considered as intelligent controller and it is very suitable when parameter changed or not known, FLC does not need to now the all dynamic model of the system, that’s mean FLC is good with nonlinear system. In this paper, we presented the modeling of DC Motor, and how to compute the full dynamic model of DC Motor, after that we built a subsystem for DC Motor using MATLAB / Simulink, then we applied the PID controller and fuzzy logic controller for controlling the speed of DC Motor, the parameters of PID controller proportional (P), integral (I), derivative (D), tuned by using PID tuning tool in Simulink, we designed FLC for speed control, then we compared the simulation results between PID and FLC, in characteristics rise time, settling time, steady-state error and overshoot. From the simulation results and table compared we found that the performance of FLC is better than the performance of the PID controller in terms of speed control in case of no disturbance or load and with disturbance or load.","PeriodicalId":346234,"journal":{"name":"International Robotics & Automation Journal","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Robotics & Automation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/iratj.2022.08.00242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The conventional PID controller is very good when all parameters of the system are Known, that’s mean the system is linear, but when the system is nonlinear because of the friction, the saturation, the disturbance, or the load the dynamic model of the system will be the change, in this case, the conventional PID controller is not good, therefore we used the FLC because it is considered as intelligent controller and it is very suitable when parameter changed or not known, FLC does not need to now the all dynamic model of the system, that’s mean FLC is good with nonlinear system. In this paper, we presented the modeling of DC Motor, and how to compute the full dynamic model of DC Motor, after that we built a subsystem for DC Motor using MATLAB / Simulink, then we applied the PID controller and fuzzy logic controller for controlling the speed of DC Motor, the parameters of PID controller proportional (P), integral (I), derivative (D), tuned by using PID tuning tool in Simulink, we designed FLC for speed control, then we compared the simulation results between PID and FLC, in characteristics rise time, settling time, steady-state error and overshoot. From the simulation results and table compared we found that the performance of FLC is better than the performance of the PID controller in terms of speed control in case of no disturbance or load and with disturbance or load.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FLC与PID控制器在直流电动机速度控制中的比较
传统PID控制器是非常好的系统的所有参数已知时,这意味着系统是线性的,但是当系统是非线性的,因为摩擦,饱和,干扰,或负载的动态模型系统将改变,在这种情况下,传统的PID控制器是不好的,因此我们使用方法,因为它被认为是智能控制器,是非常合适的参数改变或不清楚时,FLC不需要知道系统的全部动态模型,这意味着FLC可以很好地处理非线性系统。本文首先对直流电动机进行了建模,并计算了直流电动机的全动态模型,然后利用MATLAB / Simulink建立了直流电动机的子系统,然后应用PID控制器和模糊逻辑控制器对直流电动机的转速进行控制,PID控制器的参数比例(P)、积分(I)、导数(D),通过Simulink中的PID整定工具进行整定,设计了FLC进行转速控制。然后比较了PID和FLC在特性上升时间、稳定时间、稳态误差和超调量等方面的仿真结果。从仿真结果和表中对比发现,在无干扰或有负载和有干扰或有负载情况下,FLC的速度控制性能优于PID控制器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A multi-layer electro elastic drive for micro and nano robotics Artificial pancreas control using optimized fuzzy logic based genetic algorithm Innovation in robotic hearing Evaluation of the energy viability of smart IoT sensors using TinyML for computer vision applications: A case study Nuclear engineering for monitoring the thinning of the pipe wall of the Angra 1 power plant
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1