Developing a Psychosomatic Symptoms Model based on Emotional Regulation, Defense Mechanisms, and Attachment Styles Mediated by Distress Level in psychosomatic Patients

Asghar Badaye, S. Vaziri, F. Lotfi Kashani
{"title":"Developing a Psychosomatic Symptoms Model based on Emotional Regulation, Defense Mechanisms, and Attachment Styles Mediated by Distress Level in psychosomatic Patients","authors":"Asghar Badaye, S. Vaziri, F. Lotfi Kashani","doi":"10.34172/hmj.2021.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Considering the important role of anxiety in people with psychosomatic disorders, recognizing their defense mechanisms, emotion regulation techniques, and attachment styles can help support them against anxiety and stress. The aim of this study was to develop a psychosomatic symptoms model based on emotional regulation, defense mechanisms, and attachment styles mediated by distress level. Methods: In this descriptive correlational study using path analysis, 540 patients diagnosed with psychosomatic disorder using the Physical Health Questionnaire (PHQ15), were selected through purposive sampling among all medical centers in Tehran, Iran, during 2019. Then, they completed the short form of Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, Adult Attachment Styles Questionnaire, Defense Styles Questionnaire, and Kessler Psychological distress Assessment Scale (Kessler, 2002). AMOS.22 and SPSS.22 software was used for data analysis. Results: The indirect effect of anxious attachment (P<0.001), ambivalent attachment (P=0.048), immature defense mechanism (P<0.001), and neurotic defense mechanism (P<0.001) were confirmed to psychosomatic symptoms mediated by low distress. Also, the indirect effect of anxious attachment (P<0.001), mature defense mechanism (P=0.045), immature (P<0.001), and neurotic (P<0.001) correlated with psychosomatic symptoms mediated by high distress. Conclusion: Considering distress tolerance as a moderating mechanism, there was a relationship between ambivalent and anxious attachment styles, and neurotic and immature defense mechanisms with psychosomatic symptoms.","PeriodicalId":271947,"journal":{"name":"Hormozgan Medical Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hormozgan Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/hmj.2021.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Considering the important role of anxiety in people with psychosomatic disorders, recognizing their defense mechanisms, emotion regulation techniques, and attachment styles can help support them against anxiety and stress. The aim of this study was to develop a psychosomatic symptoms model based on emotional regulation, defense mechanisms, and attachment styles mediated by distress level. Methods: In this descriptive correlational study using path analysis, 540 patients diagnosed with psychosomatic disorder using the Physical Health Questionnaire (PHQ15), were selected through purposive sampling among all medical centers in Tehran, Iran, during 2019. Then, they completed the short form of Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, Adult Attachment Styles Questionnaire, Defense Styles Questionnaire, and Kessler Psychological distress Assessment Scale (Kessler, 2002). AMOS.22 and SPSS.22 software was used for data analysis. Results: The indirect effect of anxious attachment (P<0.001), ambivalent attachment (P=0.048), immature defense mechanism (P<0.001), and neurotic defense mechanism (P<0.001) were confirmed to psychosomatic symptoms mediated by low distress. Also, the indirect effect of anxious attachment (P<0.001), mature defense mechanism (P=0.045), immature (P<0.001), and neurotic (P<0.001) correlated with psychosomatic symptoms mediated by high distress. Conclusion: Considering distress tolerance as a moderating mechanism, there was a relationship between ambivalent and anxious attachment styles, and neurotic and immature defense mechanisms with psychosomatic symptoms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心身患者焦虑水平介导的情绪调节、防御机制和依恋类型的心身症状模型
背景:考虑到焦虑在心身障碍患者中的重要作用,认识他们的防御机制、情绪调节技术和依恋类型可以帮助他们对抗焦虑和压力。本研究的目的是建立一个基于情绪调节、防御机制和依恋类型的心身症状模型。方法:在本描述性相关研究中,采用通径分析方法,在2019年伊朗德黑兰所有医疗中心通过有目的抽样,选择540名使用身体健康问卷(PHQ15)诊断为心身障碍的患者。然后,他们完成了简短的认知情绪调节问卷、成人依恋类型问卷、防卫类型问卷和Kessler心理困扰评估量表(Kessler, 2002)。采用AMOS.22和SPSS.22软件进行数据分析。结果:焦虑依恋(P<0.001)、矛盾依恋(P=0.048)、不成熟防御机制(P<0.001)和神经性防御机制(P<0.001)对低焦虑介导的心身症状有间接影响。此外,焦虑依恋(P<0.001)、成熟防御机制(P=0.045)、不成熟(P<0.001)和神经质(P<0.001)的间接效应与高焦虑介导的心身症状相关。结论:考虑痛苦耐受作为调节机制,矛盾型和焦虑型依恋类型、神经质和不成熟防御机制与心身症状之间存在相关关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Oral Manifestations With Tissue Alterations of Nas or Pan Consumption: A Case Study in Bandar Abbas (Iran) in 2018 Evaluation of Birth Outcomes of Women Delivering at Home With Midwife Management Analysis of Malaria Situation in Jask County During the Implementation of the Elimination Programme in 2010-2020 The Risk of Exposure to Infectious Bacterial Bioaerosols in Different Hospital Wards: A Case Study Assessing the Level of Knowledge, Attitude, and Performance of Radiographers About Radiation Protection in Bandar Abbas, Iran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1