Roman Ingarden: Phenomenology, Responsibility and the Ontological Foundations of Morality

Simona Bertolini
{"title":"Roman Ingarden: Phenomenology, Responsibility and the Ontological Foundations of Morality","authors":"Simona Bertolini","doi":"10.26881/MAES.2019.1.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Even if Roman Ingarden did not develop an ethics stricto sensu, and although his philosophy cannot be immediately associated with a “practical turn” in phenomenology, his investigation of the essence of the real world brought him to consider the nature of man and the ontological conditions of possibility of his morally oriented actions. Without expressing normative prescriptions, and maintaining his observations in the field of eidetic description, the author felt the need to provide a foundation for ethics, inasmuch as he strived to both highlight ethical phenomenon evidence in material ontology contexts, as well as demonstrate the structural presuppositions of this phenomenon within the context of formal ontology. It is exactly this priority of ontological investigation that represents one of the most original contributions of the Polish philosopher on practical topics. The aim of this paper is to illustrate the way in which such a particular phenomenologicalontological metaethics takes shape through the theses expressed in Ingarden’s articles on human nature and responsibility.","PeriodicalId":230730,"journal":{"name":"Miscellanea Anthropologica et Sociologica","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Miscellanea Anthropologica et Sociologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26881/MAES.2019.1.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Even if Roman Ingarden did not develop an ethics stricto sensu, and although his philosophy cannot be immediately associated with a “practical turn” in phenomenology, his investigation of the essence of the real world brought him to consider the nature of man and the ontological conditions of possibility of his morally oriented actions. Without expressing normative prescriptions, and maintaining his observations in the field of eidetic description, the author felt the need to provide a foundation for ethics, inasmuch as he strived to both highlight ethical phenomenon evidence in material ontology contexts, as well as demonstrate the structural presuppositions of this phenomenon within the context of formal ontology. It is exactly this priority of ontological investigation that represents one of the most original contributions of the Polish philosopher on practical topics. The aim of this paper is to illustrate the way in which such a particular phenomenologicalontological metaethics takes shape through the theses expressed in Ingarden’s articles on human nature and responsibility.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
罗曼·因加登:现象学、责任和道德的本体论基础
即使罗曼·英加登没有发展出严格意义上的伦理学,尽管他的哲学不能立即与现象学的“实践转向”联系起来,他对现实世界本质的调查使他考虑到人的本质和他的道德导向行为的可能性的本体论条件。作者没有表达规范性的处方,并将他的观察维持在特征描述领域,他觉得有必要为伦理学提供一个基础,因为他既努力突出物质本体论背景下的伦理现象证据,又在形式本体论的背景下展示这种现象的结构性前提。正是这种本体论研究的优先级,代表了波兰哲学家在实践主题上最原始的贡献之一。本文的目的是通过英加登关于人性和责任的文章所表达的论点来说明这种特殊的现象学本体论元伦理学是如何形成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Wymiana barterowa jako strategia ubogich – między odwzajemnieniem a samowystarczalnością On the Absence of Eco-phenomenology in Poland Heidegger’s Critique of Causal Explanation in Relation to Psychotherapy. Critical Sketches on Heidegger’s “Zollikon Seminars” The Rupture and The Rapture: Eternity in Jan Patočka and Krzysztof Michalski Phenomenology contra Nazism: Dietrich von Hildebrand and Aurel Kolnai
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1