Populism, Political Regimes, and COVID-19 Deaths

Gabriel Cepaluni, M. Dorsch, Semir Dzebo
{"title":"Populism, Political Regimes, and COVID-19 Deaths","authors":"Gabriel Cepaluni, M. Dorsch, Semir Dzebo","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3816398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous research has shown that more democratic countries suffered greater COVID-19 deaths per capita and implemented policy measures that were less effective at reducing deaths than less democratic countries in the early stages of the pandemic (Cepaluni et al. 2020, Cheibub et al. 2020). But to what extent is this \"autocratic advantage\" driven by populist governments in democracies? This chapter presents new evidence that the documented effect is not driven by the subset of democracies that have populist governments. While across the entire sample, populism is associated with a greater COVID-19 death toll per capita, the deleterious effect of populism is weaker in relatively more democratic states. We argue that weaker checks and balances in more authoritarian political institutions explain the differential effect. Moreover, when examining characteristics of populism, we document that left-wing populism and anti-elite populism has been more damaging in less democratic states. Our study pursues a series of statistical analyses, employing a battery of controls that is common in this literature and a sensitivity analysis showing that our findings are robust and most likely causal.","PeriodicalId":443031,"journal":{"name":"Political Economy - Development: Political Institutions eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Economy - Development: Political Institutions eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3816398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Previous research has shown that more democratic countries suffered greater COVID-19 deaths per capita and implemented policy measures that were less effective at reducing deaths than less democratic countries in the early stages of the pandemic (Cepaluni et al. 2020, Cheibub et al. 2020). But to what extent is this "autocratic advantage" driven by populist governments in democracies? This chapter presents new evidence that the documented effect is not driven by the subset of democracies that have populist governments. While across the entire sample, populism is associated with a greater COVID-19 death toll per capita, the deleterious effect of populism is weaker in relatively more democratic states. We argue that weaker checks and balances in more authoritarian political institutions explain the differential effect. Moreover, when examining characteristics of populism, we document that left-wing populism and anti-elite populism has been more damaging in less democratic states. Our study pursues a series of statistical analyses, employing a battery of controls that is common in this literature and a sensitivity analysis showing that our findings are robust and most likely causal.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
民粹主义、政治体制和COVID-19死亡
先前的研究表明,在大流行的早期阶段,与民主程度较低的国家相比,民主程度较高的国家的人均COVID-19死亡人数更高,并且实施的政策措施在减少死亡人数方面效果较差(Cepaluni et al. 2020, Cheibub et al. 2020)。但民主国家民粹主义政府在多大程度上推动了这种“专制优势”?本章提出了新的证据,证明记录在案的影响并非由拥有民粹主义政府的民主国家子集驱动。虽然在整个样本中,民粹主义与更高的人均COVID-19死亡人数有关,但在相对更民主的国家,民粹主义的有害影响较弱。我们认为,更专制的政治制度中较弱的制衡可以解释这种差异效应。此外,在考察民粹主义的特征时,我们发现左翼民粹主义和反精英民粹主义在民主程度较低的国家更具破坏性。我们的研究进行了一系列统计分析,采用了本文献中常见的一系列控制方法,并进行了敏感性分析,表明我们的发现是稳健的,最有可能是因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Fall in Shadow Banking and the Slow U.S. Recovery Leviathan's Offer: State-Building with Elite Compensation in Early Medieval China Assessing the double materiality of climate risks in the EU economy and banking sector Local Journalism under Private Equity Ownership Is Flood Risk Priced in Bank Returns?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1