Challenges for Intelligent Data Analysis Methods in Medical Image Analysis during Surgical Interventions of Aneurysms

Abdullah Al Amoudi, S. Srinivasan, M. Sikkandar
{"title":"Challenges for Intelligent Data Analysis Methods in Medical Image Analysis during Surgical Interventions of Aneurysms","authors":"Abdullah Al Amoudi, S. Srinivasan, M. Sikkandar","doi":"10.5772/INTECHOPEN.86711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aortic aneurysms (AA) can be the primary cause of over 10,000 deaths and indirect cause for another 18,000 deaths annually in the USA as per the recent data released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Among the several factors related to high mortality, imaging methods and intervention procedures could be important. The commonly used diagnostic imaging methods of aneurysms are computed tomography (CT), magnet resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound (US), digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and amalgamation of fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) integrated with positron emission tomography (PET) and/or CT and PET with CT or MRI. Several research findings indicate that diagnostic efficiency of different imaging methods differ. As intervention procedures depend upon diagnosis, the choice of appropriate diagnostic imaging method for a given case is very important. If the critical characteristics of the swelling are not detected due to the choice of unsuitable imaging method, interventions may not be very suitable. The American College of Radiologists (ACR) prescribed some appropriateness guidelines for diagnostic imaging. Not complying with them fully or partially may also be a mortality factor. This chapter is written with recent research findings in the field of intelligent data analysis for medical applications supported by case studies and practical examples.","PeriodicalId":258976,"journal":{"name":"Aortic Aneurysm and Aortic Dissection","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aortic Aneurysm and Aortic Dissection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.86711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aortic aneurysms (AA) can be the primary cause of over 10,000 deaths and indirect cause for another 18,000 deaths annually in the USA as per the recent data released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Among the several factors related to high mortality, imaging methods and intervention procedures could be important. The commonly used diagnostic imaging methods of aneurysms are computed tomography (CT), magnet resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound (US), digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and amalgamation of fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) integrated with positron emission tomography (PET) and/or CT and PET with CT or MRI. Several research findings indicate that diagnostic efficiency of different imaging methods differ. As intervention procedures depend upon diagnosis, the choice of appropriate diagnostic imaging method for a given case is very important. If the critical characteristics of the swelling are not detected due to the choice of unsuitable imaging method, interventions may not be very suitable. The American College of Radiologists (ACR) prescribed some appropriateness guidelines for diagnostic imaging. Not complying with them fully or partially may also be a mortality factor. This chapter is written with recent research findings in the field of intelligent data analysis for medical applications supported by case studies and practical examples.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智能数据分析方法在动脉瘤手术中医学图像分析中的挑战
根据疾病控制和预防中心最近发布的数据,动脉瘤(AA)可能是美国每年超过10,000人死亡的主要原因,并间接导致另外18,000人死亡。在与高死亡率相关的几个因素中,成像方法和干预程序可能是重要的。动脉瘤常用的诊断成像方法有计算机断层扫描(CT)、磁共振成像(MRI)、超声(US)、数字减影血管造影(DSA)以及氟- d -葡萄糖(FDG)与正电子发射断层扫描(PET)和/或CT、PET与CT或MRI合并。多项研究结果表明,不同影像方法的诊断效率存在差异。由于干预程序取决于诊断,因此针对特定病例选择合适的诊断成像方法非常重要。如果由于选择不合适的成像方法而没有检测到肿胀的关键特征,则干预措施可能不太合适。美国放射科医师学会(ACR)为诊断成像制定了一些适当的指导方针。不完全或部分遵守这些规定也可能是一个死亡因素。本章是写与智能数据分析领域的最新研究成果,为医疗应用的案例研究和实际例子的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Extensive Repair in Type A Aortic Dissection: To Save the Patient or to Ensure a Durable Repair? Diagnosis and Surveillance of Aortic Root Dilation Challenges for Intelligent Data Analysis Methods in Medical Image Analysis during Surgical Interventions of Aneurysms Mycotic Aortic Aneurysms A New Mouse Model of Aortic Aneurysm Induced by Deoxycorticosterone Acetate or Aldosterone in the Presence of High Salt
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1