A Comparative Analysis of Fibre Bragg Grating Sensor and Conventional Electrical Strain Gauge Model for Structural Health Monitoring

ObajeS. P, A. M, AgbonE. E, E& OgweR
{"title":"A Comparative Analysis of Fibre Bragg Grating Sensor and Conventional Electrical Strain Gauge Model for Structural Health Monitoring","authors":"ObajeS. P, A. M, AgbonE. E, E& OgweR","doi":"10.51456/ijeit.2021.v10i10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research work presents a comparative analysis of Fibre Bragg Grating (FBG) sensor model and the conventional Electrical Strain Gauge (ESG) model for Structural Health Monitoring (SHM). SHM have been mainly deployed in telecommunication facilities owing to their exceptional ability to monitor infrastructures in hazardous environment. In this research, the FBG sensitivity was compared with that of the ESG sensor at different strain and stress values, at Poisson’s ratio ( ) of 0.19525 and 0.3, at effective refractive index (neff) of 1.44 and 1.5, and Gauge Factor (GF) of 1.1 and 1.5 respectively. FBG (A) is the FBG sensor with Poisson’s ratio of 0.3 and effective refractive index of 1.44, while FBG (B) is the FBG sensor with Poisson’s ratio of 0.19525 and effective refractive index of 1.5. The simulation result shows that FBG(A)performs better than FBG(B)by, 7.25% and 8.05% increment in sensitivity strain and stress. Also, 2.7% increment in sensitivity for ESG was achieved for induced strain and stress values on the composite structure at GF of 1.1 and 1.5 respectively. Additionally, it was observed from the obtained results that there exists a linear relationship between the FBG and ESG sensors. This observation shows that the FBG sensor can perfectly replace the conventional ESG sensor in SHM, in view of the additional advantages of the FBG sensor which are small size, immune to electromagnetic interference, light weight just to mention a few over ESG sensor.","PeriodicalId":347608,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51456/ijeit.2021.v10i10.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research work presents a comparative analysis of Fibre Bragg Grating (FBG) sensor model and the conventional Electrical Strain Gauge (ESG) model for Structural Health Monitoring (SHM). SHM have been mainly deployed in telecommunication facilities owing to their exceptional ability to monitor infrastructures in hazardous environment. In this research, the FBG sensitivity was compared with that of the ESG sensor at different strain and stress values, at Poisson’s ratio ( ) of 0.19525 and 0.3, at effective refractive index (neff) of 1.44 and 1.5, and Gauge Factor (GF) of 1.1 and 1.5 respectively. FBG (A) is the FBG sensor with Poisson’s ratio of 0.3 and effective refractive index of 1.44, while FBG (B) is the FBG sensor with Poisson’s ratio of 0.19525 and effective refractive index of 1.5. The simulation result shows that FBG(A)performs better than FBG(B)by, 7.25% and 8.05% increment in sensitivity strain and stress. Also, 2.7% increment in sensitivity for ESG was achieved for induced strain and stress values on the composite structure at GF of 1.1 and 1.5 respectively. Additionally, it was observed from the obtained results that there exists a linear relationship between the FBG and ESG sensors. This observation shows that the FBG sensor can perfectly replace the conventional ESG sensor in SHM, in view of the additional advantages of the FBG sensor which are small size, immune to electromagnetic interference, light weight just to mention a few over ESG sensor.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
光纤光栅传感器与传统电应变片模型用于结构健康监测的比较分析
本研究对用于结构健康监测(SHM)的光纤布拉格光栅(FBG)传感器模型和传统的电应变片(ESG)模型进行了比较分析。SHM主要部署在电信设施中,因为它们具有监测危险环境中的基础设施的特殊能力。在不同应变和应力值下,分别在泊松比()为0.19525和0.3,有效折射率(neff)为1.44和1.5,测量因子(GF)为1.1和1.5时,比较了FBG与ESG传感器的灵敏度。FBG (A)为泊松比为0.3、有效折射率为1.44的光纤光栅传感器,而FBG (B)为泊松比为0.19525、有效折射率为1.5的光纤光栅传感器。仿真结果表明,光纤光栅(A)的灵敏度应变和应力分别比光纤光栅(B)提高了7.25%和8.05%。在GF为1.1和1.5时,复合材料结构的诱导应变和应力值对ESG的敏感性分别提高了2.7%。此外,从得到的结果可以看出,光纤光栅和ESG传感器之间存在线性关系。这一观察表明,鉴于FBG传感器体积小、不受电磁干扰、重量轻等优点,FBG传感器可以完全取代传统的ESG传感器在SHM中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of low force friction welding process in the industrial environment MHD Flow around Circular Cylinder UnderControl through three Different magnetic Permeability Status Effects of Compressor Blade Profile Change on Thermo-economic Performance of Gas Turbine Study of the STBC based MIMO System Modeling and Evaluation Numerical Experimentation to obtain the Laguerre polynomial from average value of all characteristic polynomials of Hermitian Random Matrices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1