Comparison of cognitive strength and weaknesses between visually impaired children and non-visually impaired children

Novellia Ardhya Dewanti, Dhasthra Laksita Mayantya, Brigita Yuriza Ardiana, Banyu Wicaksono
{"title":"Comparison of cognitive strength and weaknesses between visually impaired children and non-visually impaired children","authors":"Novellia Ardhya Dewanti, Dhasthra Laksita Mayantya, Brigita Yuriza Ardiana, Banyu Wicaksono","doi":"10.21831/pri.v5i1.50189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Visually impaired children experience limitation in learning and identifying the world.  There has yet to be an intelligence measuring instrument tailor made to accommodate their limitations. Therefore, this study aims explore strengths and weaknesses of visually impaired children compared to non-visually impaired children in standard intelligence test as a pilot study for constructing intelligence test that is tailor made for visually impaired children.  This research is a quantitative approach using WISC-R as the research instrumenrs. The data was analyzed using Mann-Whitney U Test. This study found a significant difficulty experienced by visually impaired children in performance subtest. Further, no significant difference in verbal IQ was found between visually impaired children and non-visually impaired children. The results of this study are expected to be the basis for developing intelligence measuring tools for visually impaired children in the future.","PeriodicalId":254999,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Research and Intervention","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Research and Intervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21831/pri.v5i1.50189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Visually impaired children experience limitation in learning and identifying the world.  There has yet to be an intelligence measuring instrument tailor made to accommodate their limitations. Therefore, this study aims explore strengths and weaknesses of visually impaired children compared to non-visually impaired children in standard intelligence test as a pilot study for constructing intelligence test that is tailor made for visually impaired children.  This research is a quantitative approach using WISC-R as the research instrumenrs. The data was analyzed using Mann-Whitney U Test. This study found a significant difficulty experienced by visually impaired children in performance subtest. Further, no significant difference in verbal IQ was found between visually impaired children and non-visually impaired children. The results of this study are expected to be the basis for developing intelligence measuring tools for visually impaired children in the future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
视障儿童与非视障儿童认知优势与劣势比较
视障儿童在学习和识别世界方面受到限制。目前还没有一种智能测量仪器能够适应它们的局限性。因此,本研究旨在探讨视障儿童与非视障儿童在标准智力测验中的优势和劣势,作为为视障儿童量身定制智力测验的先导研究。本研究以WISC-R为研究工具,采用定量方法。数据采用Mann-Whitney U Test进行分析。本研究发现视障儿童在表现测试中存在显著的困难。此外,视障儿童和非视障儿童的语言智商没有显著差异。本研究的结果有望成为未来开发视障儿童智力测量工具的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The state of self-regulated learning and academic dishonesty of undergraduate students during online learning The influence of occupational safety and health on work engagement Intimacy of married couples: Study on communication through WhatsApp Comparison of cognitive strength and weaknesses between visually impaired children and non-visually impaired children Comparing the pace of life of a city: size and average temperature as predictors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1