Comparison of various machine learning regression models based on Human age prediction

Dr.Manaf K Hussein
{"title":"Comparison of various machine learning regression models based on Human age prediction","authors":"Dr.Manaf K Hussein","doi":"10.31185/ejuow.vol10.iss3.386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of machine learning strategies has made it possible to diagnose some disease automatically based on data obtained from medical imaging. Brain age is one of the factors that can be used as an indicator of cognitive well-being. Recent advancements in machine learning have made it possible for computers to anticipate classification and prediction outcomes more accurately than humans.\nIn this study, five widely used machine learning  regression models (Linear support vector regression (L-SVR), radial basis function support vector regression (RBF-SVR), relevance vector regression (RVR), Elastic Net and Gaussian process regression (GPR)) were trained and evaluated to predict brain age using volumes of brain regions data. Moreover, a dimensionality reduction technique was utilized to reduce the dimensionality of the input feature space. The data were collected from one hundred and eleven participants.\nThe results showed no performance difference amongst models trained on the same type of data, suggesting that the type of input data had a stronger influence on prediction performance than the model choice. The experimental results indicated that the GPR was the best fit model (R2=0.57, R=0.75) among the other regression models while the G-SVR was the worst fit model (R2=0.0006, R=0.025) with such number of the input data. ","PeriodicalId":184256,"journal":{"name":"Wasit Journal of Engineering Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wasit Journal of Engineering Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31185/ejuow.vol10.iss3.386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The development of machine learning strategies has made it possible to diagnose some disease automatically based on data obtained from medical imaging. Brain age is one of the factors that can be used as an indicator of cognitive well-being. Recent advancements in machine learning have made it possible for computers to anticipate classification and prediction outcomes more accurately than humans. In this study, five widely used machine learning  regression models (Linear support vector regression (L-SVR), radial basis function support vector regression (RBF-SVR), relevance vector regression (RVR), Elastic Net and Gaussian process regression (GPR)) were trained and evaluated to predict brain age using volumes of brain regions data. Moreover, a dimensionality reduction technique was utilized to reduce the dimensionality of the input feature space. The data were collected from one hundred and eleven participants. The results showed no performance difference amongst models trained on the same type of data, suggesting that the type of input data had a stronger influence on prediction performance than the model choice. The experimental results indicated that the GPR was the best fit model (R2=0.57, R=0.75) among the other regression models while the G-SVR was the worst fit model (R2=0.0006, R=0.025) with such number of the input data. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于人类年龄预测的各种机器学习回归模型的比较
机器学习策略的发展使得基于医学成像获得的数据自动诊断某些疾病成为可能。大脑年龄是可以作为认知健康指标的因素之一。机器学习的最新进展使计算机能够比人类更准确地预测分类和预测结果。本研究采用线性支持向量回归(L-SVR)、径向基函数支持向量回归(RBF-SVR)、相关向量回归(RVR)、弹性网(Elastic Net)和高斯过程回归(GPR)五种广泛使用的机器学习回归模型进行训练和评估,利用脑区数据量预测脑年龄。此外,采用降维技术对输入特征空间进行降维处理。数据收集自111名参与者。结果显示,在相同类型的数据上训练的模型之间没有性能差异,这表明输入数据的类型比模型选择对预测性能的影响更大。实验结果表明,在上述输入数据数量下,GPR是最适合的回归模型(R2=0.57, R=0.75),而G-SVR是最不适合的模型(R2=0.0006, R=0.025)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficient Dye Removal and Water Treatment Feasibility Assessment for Iraq's Industrial Sector: A Case Study on Terasil Blue Dye Treatment Using Inverse Fluidized Bed and Adsorption A Deep Learning Approach to Evaluating SISO-OFDM Channel Equalization Numerical Investigation of the Impact of Subcooling Inlet on Water Flow Boiling Heat Transfer Through a Microchannel Effect of Metal Foam’s Volume on the Performance of a Double Pipe heat exchanger Flow field and heat transfer characteristics in dimple pipe with different shape of dimples
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1