Preperitoneal Local Anesthesia Technique in Laparoscopic Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Placement

A. Aldohayan, R. AlSehli, Majed M Alosaimi, Abdulelah Almousa, Abdullah Alotaibi, Abdullah Zakaria Al-Dhayan, Abdurahman Zarea Alanazi, N. Aldohayan, A. Eldawlatly
{"title":"Preperitoneal Local Anesthesia Technique in Laparoscopic Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Placement","authors":"A. Aldohayan, R. AlSehli, Majed M Alosaimi, Abdulelah Almousa, Abdullah Alotaibi, Abdullah Zakaria Al-Dhayan, Abdurahman Zarea Alanazi, N. Aldohayan, A. Eldawlatly","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2021.00093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objectives: Peritoneal dialysis is an excellent treatment for end-stage renal disease. Peritoneal dialysis is more advantageous if the catheter is positioned laparoscopically with omentopexy. General anesthesia is required for laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter placement. General anesthesia is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality in high-risk patients. In this retrospective study, the results of laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheter under preperitoneal local anesthesia technique and sedation are presented for end-stage renal disease patients not fit for general anesthesia. Methods: We recruited 13 patients for laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheter out of 99 end-stage renal disease patients who presented at a local tertiary hospital. The selection criteria were based on the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification III or above and patients unfit for general anesthesia. Results: Laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheter was performed on 99 patients, and 13 patients were unfit for general anesthesia. Laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheter and omentopexy were performed on these 13 patients together with capnoperitoneum, under preperitoneal local anesthesia technique and sedation. Three catheters were removed due to exit-site infection. One patient died after 2 years due to cardiac disease. The remaining patients continued with peritoneal dialysis. No omental entrapment, catheter migration, or other complications were encountered. Conclusion: Laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheter under preperitoneal local anesthesia technique and sedation was successful for high-risk patients unfit for general anesthesia. This technique can be expanded for healthy patients to avoid general anesthesia complications, reduce costs, and speed recovery.","PeriodicalId":114569,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons","volume":"16 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2021.00093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Peritoneal dialysis is an excellent treatment for end-stage renal disease. Peritoneal dialysis is more advantageous if the catheter is positioned laparoscopically with omentopexy. General anesthesia is required for laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter placement. General anesthesia is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality in high-risk patients. In this retrospective study, the results of laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheter under preperitoneal local anesthesia technique and sedation are presented for end-stage renal disease patients not fit for general anesthesia. Methods: We recruited 13 patients for laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheter out of 99 end-stage renal disease patients who presented at a local tertiary hospital. The selection criteria were based on the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification III or above and patients unfit for general anesthesia. Results: Laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheter was performed on 99 patients, and 13 patients were unfit for general anesthesia. Laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheter and omentopexy were performed on these 13 patients together with capnoperitoneum, under preperitoneal local anesthesia technique and sedation. Three catheters were removed due to exit-site infection. One patient died after 2 years due to cardiac disease. The remaining patients continued with peritoneal dialysis. No omental entrapment, catheter migration, or other complications were encountered. Conclusion: Laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheter under preperitoneal local anesthesia technique and sedation was successful for high-risk patients unfit for general anesthesia. This technique can be expanded for healthy patients to avoid general anesthesia complications, reduce costs, and speed recovery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜腹膜透析置管中的腹膜前局部麻醉技术
背景和目的:腹膜透析是治疗终末期肾脏疾病的一种很好的方法。腹膜透析是更有利的,如果导管放置在腹腔镜网膜固定术。腹腔镜腹膜透析置管需要全身麻醉。在高危患者中,全身麻醉与术后发病率和死亡率增加有关。在本回顾性研究中,介绍了在腹膜前局麻技术和镇静下腹腔镜放置腹膜透析导管治疗不适合全麻的终末期肾病患者的结果。方法:我们从99例终末期肾病患者中招募13例进行腹腔镜下放置腹膜透析导管。选择标准以美国麻醉医师学会III级及以上分类和不适合全身麻醉的患者为依据。结果:腹腔镜下放置腹膜透析导管99例,13例不适合全麻。在腹膜前局麻技术及镇静下,对13例患者行腹腔镜下置腹膜透析导管及网膜固定术。三根导管因出口部位感染被拔除。1例患者2年后死于心脏病。其余患者继续进行腹膜透析。没有出现网膜夹持、导管移位或其他并发症。结论:在腹膜前局麻技术和镇静下,腹腔镜下放置腹膜透析导管对于不适合全麻的高危患者是成功的。这项技术可以扩展到健康患者,以避免全身麻醉并发症,降低成本,并加快恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Endoscopic Bariatric Therapies: Current Status and Future Perspectives Robotic Adrenalectomy: A 10-Year Clinical Experience at a Tertiary Medical Center Virtual SLS MIS 2021 Conference Abstract Supplement Feasibility of Laparoscopic Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Rates of Readmission and Emergency Department Visits of Publicly Versus Commercially Insured Patients in a Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program Accredited Center
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1