Using means-end theory to understand technology acceptance: a systematic literature review

Artur Martins Mol, Mônica da Consolação Machado, Lucila Ishitani
{"title":"Using means-end theory to understand technology acceptance: a systematic literature review","authors":"Artur Martins Mol, Mônica da Consolação Machado, Lucila Ishitani","doi":"10.1145/3535511.3535537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Means-end chains consist of a sequence of attributes, consequences, and values. These attributes can be understood as characteristics of a product; the consequences can be seen as benefits arising from this product’s use; the values represent the end goals important to the consumer or the motivation to use the product. Means-end chain analysis originates in marketing and relates consumers and products. In the context of systems, what drives a product to be accepted by users. Problem: To understand the application of the means-end theory in the IS area to identify factors that lead to user acceptance of a system. Solution: To conduct a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to understand how means-end theory helped understand user acceptance of technology. IS Theory: This work was inspired by the Technology Acceptance Model Theory, which helps to determine an individual’s intention to use a system. Methodology adopted: The SLR searched for scientific articles published in the last five years that contained the keywords “means-end”, “technology adoption”, “technology acceptance”, “technology resistance”, “user adoption”, “user acceptance” and “user resistance”. The search was carried out in the databases of ACM, Elsevier (ScienceDirect), and IEEE, and also by Google Scholar. Summary of results: 13 articles were selected. From the analysis of these articles, we extracted guidelines on data collection, number of recommended participants, indicators of data reliability, and data analysis. Contribution and Impact in the IS area: The results can benefit further studies applying means-end theory for analysis and survey of software requirements, particularly considering the most important values for end users.","PeriodicalId":106528,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the XVIII Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the XVIII Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3535511.3535537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Means-end chains consist of a sequence of attributes, consequences, and values. These attributes can be understood as characteristics of a product; the consequences can be seen as benefits arising from this product’s use; the values represent the end goals important to the consumer or the motivation to use the product. Means-end chain analysis originates in marketing and relates consumers and products. In the context of systems, what drives a product to be accepted by users. Problem: To understand the application of the means-end theory in the IS area to identify factors that lead to user acceptance of a system. Solution: To conduct a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to understand how means-end theory helped understand user acceptance of technology. IS Theory: This work was inspired by the Technology Acceptance Model Theory, which helps to determine an individual’s intention to use a system. Methodology adopted: The SLR searched for scientific articles published in the last five years that contained the keywords “means-end”, “technology adoption”, “technology acceptance”, “technology resistance”, “user adoption”, “user acceptance” and “user resistance”. The search was carried out in the databases of ACM, Elsevier (ScienceDirect), and IEEE, and also by Google Scholar. Summary of results: 13 articles were selected. From the analysis of these articles, we extracted guidelines on data collection, number of recommended participants, indicators of data reliability, and data analysis. Contribution and Impact in the IS area: The results can benefit further studies applying means-end theory for analysis and survey of software requirements, particularly considering the most important values for end users.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用手段目的理论理解技术接受:系统的文献综述
上下文:手段-目的链由一系列属性、结果和值组成。这些属性可以理解为产品的特征;这些后果可以看作是使用本产品所带来的好处;这些价值代表了对消费者重要的最终目标或使用产品的动机。手段端链分析起源于市场营销,将消费者和产品联系起来。在系统的上下文中,是什么驱使产品被用户接受。问题:了解手段-目的理论在信息系统领域的应用,以确定导致用户接受系统的因素。解决方案:进行系统文献综述(SLR),以了解手段-目的理论如何帮助理解用户对技术的接受程度。IS理论:这项工作受到技术接受模型理论的启发,该理论有助于确定个人使用系统的意图。采用的方法:SLR检索了近五年发表的包含关键词“means-end”、“technology adoption”、“technology acceptance”、“technology resistance”、“user adoption”、“user acceptance”和“user resistance”的科学文章。检索在ACM、Elsevier (ScienceDirect)和IEEE的数据库中进行,也通过Google Scholar进行。结果总结:入选13篇文章。从这些文章的分析中,我们提取了数据收集、推荐参与者数量、数据可靠性指标和数据分析的指南。在信息系统领域的贡献和影响:结果有利于应用目的-目的理论对软件需求进行分析和调查的进一步研究,特别是考虑对最终用户最重要的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the Use of Mobile Application to Advance Agricultural Traceability Investigating Information Security in Systems-of-Systems Automated Statistics Extraction of Public Security Events Reported Through Microtexts on Social Networks Supporting Interorganizational Relationships Management A Mobile Application for on-Demand Scheduling of Health Services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1