Efficiency of inoculation methods for genotypes selection in corn ear rot disease studies

Sabrina Helena Araujo, O. Júnior, Luis Oswaldo Viteri, Raimundo Wagner Aguiar, E. E. Oliveira, G. R. Santos
{"title":"Efficiency of inoculation methods for genotypes selection in corn ear rot disease studies","authors":"Sabrina Helena Araujo, O. Júnior, Luis Oswaldo Viteri, Raimundo Wagner Aguiar, E. E. Oliveira, G. R. Santos","doi":"10.22267/rcia.223902.191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The identification of resistance of plants to pathogens is crucial for the development of hybrids by breeding programs. To achieve that, it is of great relevance to establish effective inoculation methods for characterizing genotypes with adequate plant resistance levels. Several inoculation methods have been investigated in the search for resistance to corn ear rot disease. However, studies evaluating different corn genotypes cultivated under Neotropical field conditions remain unexplored. Here, we compared three inoculation methods (i.e., aspersion, injectable, and natural) of Fusarium verticillioides in corn ears, and evaluated disease severity and grain yield of 10 corn genotypes. The experiments were conducted in two consecutive experimental corn crop (i.e., 2015 and 2016) seasons located in cities with different environmental temperatures and belonging to different Brazilian states (i.e., Gurupi – Tocantins State, Itumbiara – Goiás State, Planaltina – Brazilian Federal District, and Toledo – Paraná State). We evaluated the mass of 1000 grains and the severity of the disease. Regarding the disease severity, our results showed that the artificial inoculation was more efficient in the regions of Planaltina and Toledo, not affecting grains’ mass in these localities. The severity of disease on the conditions of Toledo was similar for the ten genotypes. However, it was possible to identify two contrasting genotypes since P4285H (low severity) and 32R48YH (medium severity) exhibited significantly more disease symptoms in all other regions. Although the differences regarding the efficiency of inoculation methods are more evident in regions with milder temperatures, the results showed that the characterization of genotypes susceptible to the pathogen is more efficient in regions with higher temperatures.","PeriodicalId":211714,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Ciencias Agrícolas","volume":"73 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Ciencias Agrícolas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22267/rcia.223902.191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The identification of resistance of plants to pathogens is crucial for the development of hybrids by breeding programs. To achieve that, it is of great relevance to establish effective inoculation methods for characterizing genotypes with adequate plant resistance levels. Several inoculation methods have been investigated in the search for resistance to corn ear rot disease. However, studies evaluating different corn genotypes cultivated under Neotropical field conditions remain unexplored. Here, we compared three inoculation methods (i.e., aspersion, injectable, and natural) of Fusarium verticillioides in corn ears, and evaluated disease severity and grain yield of 10 corn genotypes. The experiments were conducted in two consecutive experimental corn crop (i.e., 2015 and 2016) seasons located in cities with different environmental temperatures and belonging to different Brazilian states (i.e., Gurupi – Tocantins State, Itumbiara – Goiás State, Planaltina – Brazilian Federal District, and Toledo – Paraná State). We evaluated the mass of 1000 grains and the severity of the disease. Regarding the disease severity, our results showed that the artificial inoculation was more efficient in the regions of Planaltina and Toledo, not affecting grains’ mass in these localities. The severity of disease on the conditions of Toledo was similar for the ten genotypes. However, it was possible to identify two contrasting genotypes since P4285H (low severity) and 32R48YH (medium severity) exhibited significantly more disease symptoms in all other regions. Although the differences regarding the efficiency of inoculation methods are more evident in regions with milder temperatures, the results showed that the characterization of genotypes susceptible to the pathogen is more efficient in regions with higher temperatures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
玉米穗腐病研究中接种方法基因型选择的有效性
鉴定植物对病原菌的抗性对杂交育种至关重要。为了实现这一目标,建立有效的接种方法来鉴定具有适当植物抗性水平的基因型具有重要意义。为寻找玉米穗腐病的抗性,研究了几种接种方法。然而,在新热带大田条件下评价不同玉米基因型的研究仍未开展。本研究比较了三种接种方法(喷洒、注射和自然接种)在玉米穗上对黄萎病的影响,并对10种玉米基因型的病害严重程度和产量进行了评价。实验在巴西不同州(Gurupi - Tocantins州、Itumbiara - Goiás州、Planaltina -巴西联邦区和Toledo - paran州)环境温度不同的城市连续两个玉米作物试验季节(即2015年和2016年)进行。我们评估了1000粒谷物的质量和疾病的严重程度。在严重程度上,我们的结果表明,人工接种在Planaltina和Toledo地区更有效,不影响这些地区的籽粒质量。10个基因型在托莱多条件下的疾病严重程度相似。然而,由于P4285H(低严重程度)和32R48YH(中等严重程度)在所有其他地区表现出更多的疾病症状,因此有可能鉴定出两种不同的基因型。虽然接种方法的效率差异在温度较温和的地区更为明显,但结果表明,在温度较高的地区,对病原体敏感的基因型的鉴定效率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Morph-physiology and development of soybean cultivars under irrigation shift Morph-physiology and development of soybean cultivars under irrigation shift Detection of Groundnut ringspot virus carried by Frankliniella sp. on watermelon fields in Brazilian Cerrado Allometric model for height estimation of Alnus acuminata Kunth in agroecological zones of the high Andean tropics Physiological characterization of Carica papaya L. variety UN Cotové
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1