Proper Surgical Treatment of Small and Medium Size Umbilical Hernias. A Single Surgeon Experience

E. Élthes, D. Sala, R. Neagoe, János Székely, M. Dénes
{"title":"Proper Surgical Treatment of Small and Medium Size Umbilical Hernias. A Single Surgeon Experience","authors":"E. Élthes, D. Sala, R. Neagoe, János Székely, M. Dénes","doi":"10.2478/jim-2020-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction: Minimally invasive surgical procedures have become routine interventions nowadays and represent an effective therapeutic option even for small umbilical hernias, providing favorable postoperative and aesthetic results. Aim of study: To determine the most appropriate minimally invasive treatment option for small and medium size umbilical hernias. Materials and methods: We conducted a prospective study on 50 patients with small or medium umbilical hernia (<4 cm). All patients benefited of minimal invasive surgery with mesh implantation. Depending on the surgical procedure, two major groups were defined: group A – patients with open surgical approach (n = 24) and group B – patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery (n = 26). Clinical, surgical, postoperative, and follow-up data were analyzed. Results: Mesh replacement via open approach through the umbilicus was associated with significantly reduced surgical time (p = 0.0359), administration of painkillers (p = 0.0461), and use of anticoagulants (p = 0.0404). Hospital stays (p = 0.0001) and costs (p = 0.0005) were also significantly lower in this group. After 6 months of follow-up, no recurrence was observed, and no significant differences were detected regarding postoperative pain and the patients’ professional reintegration. Patient satisfaction regarding postoperative scar was superior in the open group. Conclusion: The present study indicates that the ventral patch technique is a safe and effective method for the treatment of small and medium size umbilical hernias.","PeriodicalId":234618,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interdisciplinary Medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interdisciplinary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jim-2020-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Minimally invasive surgical procedures have become routine interventions nowadays and represent an effective therapeutic option even for small umbilical hernias, providing favorable postoperative and aesthetic results. Aim of study: To determine the most appropriate minimally invasive treatment option for small and medium size umbilical hernias. Materials and methods: We conducted a prospective study on 50 patients with small or medium umbilical hernia (<4 cm). All patients benefited of minimal invasive surgery with mesh implantation. Depending on the surgical procedure, two major groups were defined: group A – patients with open surgical approach (n = 24) and group B – patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery (n = 26). Clinical, surgical, postoperative, and follow-up data were analyzed. Results: Mesh replacement via open approach through the umbilicus was associated with significantly reduced surgical time (p = 0.0359), administration of painkillers (p = 0.0461), and use of anticoagulants (p = 0.0404). Hospital stays (p = 0.0001) and costs (p = 0.0005) were also significantly lower in this group. After 6 months of follow-up, no recurrence was observed, and no significant differences were detected regarding postoperative pain and the patients’ professional reintegration. Patient satisfaction regarding postoperative scar was superior in the open group. Conclusion: The present study indicates that the ventral patch technique is a safe and effective method for the treatment of small and medium size umbilical hernias.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中小型脐疝的外科治疗。一个外科医生的经历
摘要简介:微创外科手术已成为当今的常规干预措施,即使是小脐疝也代表了一种有效的治疗选择,提供了良好的术后和美学效果。目的:探讨中小型脐疝最合适的微创治疗方案。材料和方法:我们对50例中小型脐疝(<4 cm)患者进行了前瞻性研究。所有患者均受益于微创补片植入手术。根据手术方式,分为两大组:A组-开放手术入路患者(n = 24)和B组-腹腔镜手术患者(n = 26)。对临床、手术、术后及随访资料进行分析。结果:经脐开放入路补片置换与手术时间(p = 0.0359)、止痛药(p = 0.0461)和抗凝血剂(p = 0.0404)的使用显著缩短相关。该组住院时间(p = 0.0001)和费用(p = 0.0005)也显著降低。随访6个月,未见复发,术后疼痛及患者职业重返方面无明显差异。开放组患者对术后瘢痕的满意度较高。结论:腹侧补片技术是一种安全有效的治疗中小型脐疝的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digitization of Gynecology Using Artificial Intelligence: Cervical Mapping Corroborated With Clinical Data for Conization Necessity A Cadaveric Study of Two Uncommon Cases of Sural Nerve Complex Variation Pseudohalitosis – More than a Complicated Multidisciplinary Case Experience in the Morphological Study of Dorsolumbar Spine Deformities in Women over 50 Years Sweet Syndrome in a Patient with Acute Leukemia on Azacitidine and Venetoclax Treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1