Disarming the dispirited South African: A critical analysis of the proposed ban on firearms for self-defence

W. Nortje, Shane Hull
{"title":"Disarming the dispirited South African: A critical analysis of the proposed ban on firearms for self-defence","authors":"W. Nortje, Shane Hull","doi":"10.17159/2077-4907/2023/ldd.v27.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In South Africa, owning a firearm is a privilege and not a right. This privilege is regulated by the Firearms Control Act 60 of 2000. In May 2021, the Minister of Police published the Firearms Control Amendment Bill (FCAB), 2021, which contains a section prohibiting individuals from obtaining a firearm for self-defence purposes. This article challenges this view and argues that firearm owners should not be banned from protecting their right to life with a firearm. It looks at the reasons why the Bill was published as well as its purposes. The enactment of such a Bill would have severe consequences for individuals who want to protect their constitutional rights in a country with one of the highest crime rates in the world. Consequently, the article also examines the impact the proposed prohibition would have on self-defence by means of a firearm. Furthermore, the South African Police Service (SAPS) is reluctant to address its own challenges, which have contributed significantly to the proliferation of unlicensed firearms. The supply of firearms by SAPS to criminals will be examined and recommendations made for addressing the dilemma faced by SAPS. SAPS should rectify and professionalise its firearm regime instead of disarming South Africans, who are desperately in need of a peaceful society. Finally, proposals are made as to how firearm control could be improved.","PeriodicalId":341103,"journal":{"name":"Law, Democracy and Development","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law, Democracy and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2077-4907/2023/ldd.v27.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In South Africa, owning a firearm is a privilege and not a right. This privilege is regulated by the Firearms Control Act 60 of 2000. In May 2021, the Minister of Police published the Firearms Control Amendment Bill (FCAB), 2021, which contains a section prohibiting individuals from obtaining a firearm for self-defence purposes. This article challenges this view and argues that firearm owners should not be banned from protecting their right to life with a firearm. It looks at the reasons why the Bill was published as well as its purposes. The enactment of such a Bill would have severe consequences for individuals who want to protect their constitutional rights in a country with one of the highest crime rates in the world. Consequently, the article also examines the impact the proposed prohibition would have on self-defence by means of a firearm. Furthermore, the South African Police Service (SAPS) is reluctant to address its own challenges, which have contributed significantly to the proliferation of unlicensed firearms. The supply of firearms by SAPS to criminals will be examined and recommendations made for addressing the dilemma faced by SAPS. SAPS should rectify and professionalise its firearm regime instead of disarming South Africans, who are desperately in need of a peaceful society. Finally, proposals are made as to how firearm control could be improved.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解除沮丧的南非人的武装:对拟议的禁止枪支自卫的批判性分析
在南非,拥有枪支是一种特权,而不是权利。这一特权受到2000年《枪支管制法》第60号的规定。2021年5月,警察部长公布了2021年《枪支管制修正案法案》(FCAB),其中包含禁止个人出于自卫目的获得枪支的部分。这篇文章挑战了这一观点,认为不应该禁止枪支拥有者用枪支保护他们的生命权。本文介绍《条例草案》公布的原因及目的。在这个世界上犯罪率最高的国家之一,颁布这样一项法案将对那些想要保护其宪法权利的个人产生严重后果。因此,该条还审查了拟议的禁令对使用火器进行自卫的影响。此外,南非警察部门不愿意解决其本身的挑战,这些挑战在很大程度上助长了无证枪支的扩散。将审查SAPS向罪犯供应枪支的问题,并提出建议,以解决SAPS面临的困境。南非国家警察部队应该纠正其枪支制度并使其专业化,而不是解除南非人的武装,他们迫切需要一个和平的社会。最后,就如何改进枪支管制提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A critique of the efficacy of the right to shelter for street children in Kenya A critical analysis of Massmart Holdings and Others v South African Commercial Catering and Allied Workers Union [2022] ZALCJHB 119 The rights of women in unregistered customary marriages in Zimbabwe: Best practices from South Africa Eliminating racial discrimination of employees: An assessment of the Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998, as amended A turning-point for transitional justice? Political violence in Zimbabwe, and transformative justice as a way forward
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1