Heuristics and Biases in System Architecture

Taylor Yeazitzis, Kristin Weger, J. Clerkin, Bryan L. Mesmer
{"title":"Heuristics and Biases in System Architecture","authors":"Taylor Yeazitzis, Kristin Weger, J. Clerkin, Bryan L. Mesmer","doi":"10.1109/sieds55548.2022.9841477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the design of complex technological systems, the use of system architecture, a type of conceptual model, is being considered as a promising solution for formalizing and communicating the structure, behavior, and views of subsystems and components. A system architecture is used to enable the design of a system that includes both software and hardware; however, during conceptualization of a system architecture, heuristics, which are also referred to as mental shortcuts, are used and sometimes even encouraged to save mental energy during a decision-making process. One of the challenges inherent in developing a system architecture is producing the architecture with minimal biases. Biases may introduce unwanted influences on the design or conceptual model of a system. Presently, there is a lack of research regarding the heuristics or subsequent biases that may be present within a system architecture process. The purpose of this research is to better understand influential factors on the architecting process by conducting a literature review on heuristics and biases that may be found within system architecture. Specifically, this research will focus on the three main heuristics of availability, anchoring and adjustment, and representativeness as well as biases associated with each. Finally, future avenues for research are suggested and elaborated to further practitioners’ understanding of heuristics and biases within system architecture.","PeriodicalId":286724,"journal":{"name":"2022 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/sieds55548.2022.9841477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For the design of complex technological systems, the use of system architecture, a type of conceptual model, is being considered as a promising solution for formalizing and communicating the structure, behavior, and views of subsystems and components. A system architecture is used to enable the design of a system that includes both software and hardware; however, during conceptualization of a system architecture, heuristics, which are also referred to as mental shortcuts, are used and sometimes even encouraged to save mental energy during a decision-making process. One of the challenges inherent in developing a system architecture is producing the architecture with minimal biases. Biases may introduce unwanted influences on the design or conceptual model of a system. Presently, there is a lack of research regarding the heuristics or subsequent biases that may be present within a system architecture process. The purpose of this research is to better understand influential factors on the architecting process by conducting a literature review on heuristics and biases that may be found within system architecture. Specifically, this research will focus on the three main heuristics of availability, anchoring and adjustment, and representativeness as well as biases associated with each. Finally, future avenues for research are suggested and elaborated to further practitioners’ understanding of heuristics and biases within system architecture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
系统架构中的启发式和偏差
对于复杂技术系统的设计,系统架构(一种概念模型)的使用被认为是一种很有前途的解决方案,用于形式化和交流子系统和组件的结构、行为和视图。系统架构用于实现包括软件和硬件的系统设计;然而,在系统架构的概念化过程中,启发式(也被称为思维捷径)被使用,有时甚至被鼓励在决策过程中节省脑力。开发系统架构所固有的挑战之一是产生最小偏差的架构。偏差可能会对系统的设计或概念模型带来不必要的影响。目前,缺乏关于系统架构过程中可能存在的启发式或后续偏差的研究。本研究的目的是通过对系统架构中可能发现的启发式和偏差进行文献回顾来更好地理解架构过程中的影响因素。具体而言,本研究将重点关注可用性、锚定和调整、代表性以及与每种启发式相关的偏差这三种主要启发式。最后,提出并阐述了未来的研究途径,以进一步加深从业者对系统架构中的启发式和偏差的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Linville Creek Bridge: A Case Study of Design Thinking in Structural Engineering Convergence Across Behavioral and Self-report Measures Evaluating Individuals' Trust in an Autonomous Golf Cart Investigating the Illicit Trade of Cultural Property with an Automated Data Pipeline Architecture Investigating Disinformation Through the Lens of Mass Media: A System Design Dynamic Coal Production Line: Plant Design and Analysis Tool
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1