Sustainability Assessment of Integrated Waste-to-Use Systems: A Case of Uganda

M. F. Agunyo
{"title":"Sustainability Assessment of Integrated Waste-to-Use Systems: A Case of Uganda","authors":"M. F. Agunyo","doi":"10.15377/2410-3624.2022.09.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For countries like Uganda where organic waste composition accounts for at least 70% of the solid waste generated, collected, and disposed of at landfills and dumpsites, recovery of resources from the waste stream is crucial. This is because disposal of the waste in the landfills/dump sites exerts more pressure on land as a resource in addition to the environmental negative impacts associated with the degradation of the waste in the landfills, pollution of groundwater from leachate, generation of greenhouses gases, bad odor, and poor aesthetics. Moreover, given that the country also grapples with sewage and faecal sludge treatment and management due to the limited plants in place, alternative Waste-to-Use systems that promote resource recovery and management of various organic waste streams such as biowaste, animal manure, sewage/faecal sludge and wastewater could be a viable solution. The systems which consist of a combination of various technologies such as anaerobic digestion, incineration, landfilling, composting, and pyrolysis to produce briquettes boast of managing various organic waste streams and potential for application in various entities such as housing estates, towns/cities, at institutions. To assess the sustainability of such systems, multicriteria decision analysis was used. The results indicated that if trade-off of any aspect was considered i.e., technical, environmental, social, and financial, the Waste-to-Use systems were preferred i.e., a system consisting of composting and anaerobic digestion technologies. Also, a sustainability framework for the assessment of similar systems was proposed and it highlights the importance of involving stakeholders through the various stages such as, situation analysis, problem identification and definition, criteria and indictor selection, elicitation of scores and weight so that transparency in decision making can be boosted.","PeriodicalId":184880,"journal":{"name":"The Global Environmental Engineers","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Global Environmental Engineers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15377/2410-3624.2022.09.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

For countries like Uganda where organic waste composition accounts for at least 70% of the solid waste generated, collected, and disposed of at landfills and dumpsites, recovery of resources from the waste stream is crucial. This is because disposal of the waste in the landfills/dump sites exerts more pressure on land as a resource in addition to the environmental negative impacts associated with the degradation of the waste in the landfills, pollution of groundwater from leachate, generation of greenhouses gases, bad odor, and poor aesthetics. Moreover, given that the country also grapples with sewage and faecal sludge treatment and management due to the limited plants in place, alternative Waste-to-Use systems that promote resource recovery and management of various organic waste streams such as biowaste, animal manure, sewage/faecal sludge and wastewater could be a viable solution. The systems which consist of a combination of various technologies such as anaerobic digestion, incineration, landfilling, composting, and pyrolysis to produce briquettes boast of managing various organic waste streams and potential for application in various entities such as housing estates, towns/cities, at institutions. To assess the sustainability of such systems, multicriteria decision analysis was used. The results indicated that if trade-off of any aspect was considered i.e., technical, environmental, social, and financial, the Waste-to-Use systems were preferred i.e., a system consisting of composting and anaerobic digestion technologies. Also, a sustainability framework for the assessment of similar systems was proposed and it highlights the importance of involving stakeholders through the various stages such as, situation analysis, problem identification and definition, criteria and indictor selection, elicitation of scores and weight so that transparency in decision making can be boosted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
综合废物利用系统的可持续性评估:以乌干达为例
对于乌干达这样的国家来说,有机废物成分至少占垃圾填埋场和垃圾场产生、收集和处置的固体废物的70%,从废物流中回收资源至关重要。这是因为在堆填区/倾卸场处理废物会对土地资源造成更大的压力,此外,废物在堆填区的降解、渗滤液污染地下水、产生温室气体、难闻的气味和不美观也会对环境产生负面影响。此外,由于现有工厂有限,该国还在努力解决污水和粪便污泥的处理和管理问题,因此,促进生物废物、动物粪便、污水/粪便污泥和废水等各种有机废物流的资源回收和管理的替代废物利用系统可能是一个可行的解决方案。该系统由厌氧消化、焚化、堆填、堆肥和热解等多种技术组合而成,以生产压块,可管理各种有机废物流,并有可能应用于各种实体,如屋邨、城镇/城市和机构。为了评估这些系统的可持续性,采用了多标准决策分析。结果表明,如果考虑技术、环境、社会和经济等方面的权衡,废物利用系统是优选的,即由堆肥和厌氧消化技术组成的系统。此外,还提出了评估类似系统的可持续性框架,该框架强调了在情况分析、问题识别和定义、标准和指标选择、得出分数和权重等各个阶段让利益攸关方参与的重要性,从而可以提高决策的透明度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Challenges and the Way Forward for Management and Handling of Hazardous Waste Sustainability Assessment of Integrated Waste-to-Use Systems: A Case of Uganda Visual Analysis of Activity Construction Based on Bibliometrics Technologies for Halide Removal in Water Treatment – A State-of-the-Art Review Revolutionizing Fuel Cell Efficiency with Non-Metallic Catalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reactions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1