Georg Simmel and Semyon Frank: from Kant to Lebensphilosophie

Alexander L. Begrambekov
{"title":"Georg Simmel and Semyon Frank: from Kant to Lebensphilosophie","authors":"Alexander L. Begrambekov","doi":"10.17323/1728-192x-2022-4-57-81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Georg Simmel’s legacy is traditionally distinguished between sociological and philosophical works so that researchers have little overlap in his areas of interest with their colleagues. Simmel, however, was different in each of these disciplines. It is particularly evident in the context of his relationship with Kant. His sociology, more relevant before 1908, leads to Kant, while his philosophy (the so-called Lebensphilosophie or ‘philosophy of life’) developed after 1908, is opposed to Kant. This research aims to explain this dichotomy. Many thinkers transitioned from Kant to Simmel’s Lebensphilosophie, including Simmel’s student, Semyon Frank, whose fate resembles that of his teacher in many ways. Frank attended his lectures in 1898, translated and reviewed his works, and wrote about Simmel in his own essays. In general, it is difficult to find a figure among the foreign contemporaries of Frank who had a more significant influence on him than Simmel. In many ways, Frank was Simmel’s Russian counterpart: both were baptized Jews in Christian countries; both passed through a school of controversial opinions in many ways fatal to their destiny; both were exiles, despite their prolificacy and significance, and both were unsteady in their academic statuses, but highly appreciated by their colleagues. Frank is a well-known figure in the history of Russian religious philosophу, but his philosophy in the context of his path from Kantianism to his philosophy of life has not been sufficiently studied. This research also aims to fill this gap and to present Frank to Simmel’s readers.","PeriodicalId":102221,"journal":{"name":"Sotsiologicheskoe Obozrenie / Russian Sociological Review","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sotsiologicheskoe Obozrenie / Russian Sociological Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/1728-192x-2022-4-57-81","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Georg Simmel’s legacy is traditionally distinguished between sociological and philosophical works so that researchers have little overlap in his areas of interest with their colleagues. Simmel, however, was different in each of these disciplines. It is particularly evident in the context of his relationship with Kant. His sociology, more relevant before 1908, leads to Kant, while his philosophy (the so-called Lebensphilosophie or ‘philosophy of life’) developed after 1908, is opposed to Kant. This research aims to explain this dichotomy. Many thinkers transitioned from Kant to Simmel’s Lebensphilosophie, including Simmel’s student, Semyon Frank, whose fate resembles that of his teacher in many ways. Frank attended his lectures in 1898, translated and reviewed his works, and wrote about Simmel in his own essays. In general, it is difficult to find a figure among the foreign contemporaries of Frank who had a more significant influence on him than Simmel. In many ways, Frank was Simmel’s Russian counterpart: both were baptized Jews in Christian countries; both passed through a school of controversial opinions in many ways fatal to their destiny; both were exiles, despite their prolificacy and significance, and both were unsteady in their academic statuses, but highly appreciated by their colleagues. Frank is a well-known figure in the history of Russian religious philosophу, but his philosophy in the context of his path from Kantianism to his philosophy of life has not been sufficiently studied. This research also aims to fill this gap and to present Frank to Simmel’s readers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乔治·齐美尔和谢苗·弗兰克:从康德到利本哲学
乔治·齐美尔的遗产传统上被区分为社会学和哲学著作,因此研究人员在他感兴趣的领域与他们的同事几乎没有重叠。然而,齐美尔在这些学科上都有所不同。这一点在他与康德的关系中尤为明显。他的社会学,在1908年之前更相关,导致康德,而他的哲学(所谓的lebensphiophie或“生命哲学”)在1908年之后发展,是反对康德的。本研究旨在解释这种二分法。许多思想家从康德过渡到齐美尔的lebenphilosophy,包括齐美尔的学生Semyon Frank,他的命运在很多方面与他的老师相似。1898年,弗兰克参加了他的讲座,翻译并评论了他的作品,并在自己的随笔中写了关于齐美尔的文章。总的来说,在与弗兰克同时代的外国人中,很难找到一个比齐美尔对他的影响更大的人。在很多方面,弗兰克是西美尔的俄国翻版:两人都是在基督教国家受洗的犹太人;他们两人都经历了一个充满争议的学派,在许多方面对他们的命运都是致命的;他们都是流亡者,尽管他们的成果丰富,意义重大;他们的学术地位都不稳定,但都受到同事的高度赞赏。在俄罗斯宗教哲学史上,弗兰克是一位著名的人物,但他的哲学在从康德主义到人生哲学的过程中却没有得到充分的研究。本研究也旨在填补这一空白,并将弗兰克呈现给齐美尔的读者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is Ethnic Discrimination a Matter of Common Sense in the Fight against Crime and Terrorism? On Violence in History Post-City (II): Cartographies of Imaginaton and Co-spatiality Politics Radical Democratic Model of Politics as a Response to the Problem of Refugees Political Integration The Philosopher Robert Spaemann and His Public Positions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1