The Boundaries of Faith

Ahmad S. Dallal
{"title":"The Boundaries of Faith","authors":"Ahmad S. Dallal","doi":"10.5149/NORTHCAROLINA/9781469641409.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Both the older historiography and the revisionist accounts persist in using Wahhabism as a model for depicting Islamic activism and thought in the eighteenth century. This persistence, the chapter argues, is one reason for viewing the eighteenth century as a century of decline. In contrast, the chapter demonstrates that a majority of eighteenth century Muslim thinkers articulate views that are radically opposed to Wahhabi ideas. The chapter outlines the very rich discourse against takfir that prevailed in eighteenth century thought. It also argues that Wahhabism was the exception to eighteenth century thought, and that there is no connection between it and other intellectual trends in the eighteenth century.","PeriodicalId":230917,"journal":{"name":"Islam without Europe","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Islam without Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5149/NORTHCAROLINA/9781469641409.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Both the older historiography and the revisionist accounts persist in using Wahhabism as a model for depicting Islamic activism and thought in the eighteenth century. This persistence, the chapter argues, is one reason for viewing the eighteenth century as a century of decline. In contrast, the chapter demonstrates that a majority of eighteenth century Muslim thinkers articulate views that are radically opposed to Wahhabi ideas. The chapter outlines the very rich discourse against takfir that prevailed in eighteenth century thought. It also argues that Wahhabism was the exception to eighteenth century thought, and that there is no connection between it and other intellectual trends in the eighteenth century.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信仰的界限
旧的史学和修正主义的叙述都坚持使用瓦哈比派作为描述18世纪伊斯兰激进主义和思想的模式。本章认为,这种坚持是将18世纪视为衰落世纪的原因之一。相反,本章表明,大多数18世纪的穆斯林思想家表达了与瓦哈比思想截然相反的观点。这一章概述了18世纪思想中盛行的反对塔克菲尔的丰富论述。它还认为,瓦哈比主义是18世纪思想的例外,它与18世纪的其他知识趋势之间没有联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ijtihād and the Regional Origins of a Universal Vision Genealogies of Dissent and the Politics of Knowledge Humanizing the Sacred The Boundaries of Faith Sufism, Old and New
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1