Histerosalpingografide Kullanılan İyotlu Kontrast Maddenin Vücut Sıcaklığında ya da Oda Sıcaklığında Uygulanmasının Vizüel Analog Skala Skorlarına Etkisi
Burak Ersak, Yasemin Taşçi, Rahime BEDİR FINDIK, Duygu TUĞRUL ERSAK, A. Tokmak, Mahmut Kuntay Kokanalı
{"title":"Histerosalpingografide Kullanılan İyotlu Kontrast Maddenin Vücut Sıcaklığında ya da Oda Sıcaklığında Uygulanmasının Vizüel Analog Skala Skorlarına Etkisi","authors":"Burak Ersak, Yasemin Taşçi, Rahime BEDİR FINDIK, Duygu TUĞRUL ERSAK, A. Tokmak, Mahmut Kuntay Kokanalı","doi":"10.38136/jgon.1139732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To compare pain scores of infertile patients during and after hysterosalpingography (HSG) procedure using visual analoge scale (VAS) between cold and warm contrast medium and to investigate whether using warm contrast can alter spontaneous pregnancy rate. \nMaterials and Methods: Prospective randomized study between March-September 2017. Primary infertile patients undergoing HSG procedure. Patients’ age, body mass index (BMI), history of previous surgery, duration of infertility and pain levels during the most painful menstrual period were recorded. The pain severity was questioned during and at the 30th minute after the procedure using VAS. While patients who underwent HSG using a contrast medium at body temperature 37 °C were defined as warm group(n:55), patients who underwent HSG using a contrast medium at room temperature 23 °C were defined as cold group (n:55). \nResults: There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age, BMI, duration of infertility, previous surgery and VAS during menstruation. The mean duration of HSG of warm group patients was significantly lower(p=0.001). Warm group patients’ mean VAS score during and 30 minutes after HSG were significantly lower than in the control group ( 5.3±4.2 vs 7.5±2.0), (1.1±0.9 vs 2.4±1.4), respectively. While severe pain percentage during HSG in warm group was 25.5%, it was 66.7% in the control group. In logistic regression analysis, warm and cold groups were only found as significant related factors for severe pain felt during procedure (p","PeriodicalId":119624,"journal":{"name":"Jinekoloji-Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tıp Dergisi","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jinekoloji-Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tıp Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38136/jgon.1139732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: To compare pain scores of infertile patients during and after hysterosalpingography (HSG) procedure using visual analoge scale (VAS) between cold and warm contrast medium and to investigate whether using warm contrast can alter spontaneous pregnancy rate.
Materials and Methods: Prospective randomized study between March-September 2017. Primary infertile patients undergoing HSG procedure. Patients’ age, body mass index (BMI), history of previous surgery, duration of infertility and pain levels during the most painful menstrual period were recorded. The pain severity was questioned during and at the 30th minute after the procedure using VAS. While patients who underwent HSG using a contrast medium at body temperature 37 °C were defined as warm group(n:55), patients who underwent HSG using a contrast medium at room temperature 23 °C were defined as cold group (n:55).
Results: There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age, BMI, duration of infertility, previous surgery and VAS during menstruation. The mean duration of HSG of warm group patients was significantly lower(p=0.001). Warm group patients’ mean VAS score during and 30 minutes after HSG were significantly lower than in the control group ( 5.3±4.2 vs 7.5±2.0), (1.1±0.9 vs 2.4±1.4), respectively. While severe pain percentage during HSG in warm group was 25.5%, it was 66.7% in the control group. In logistic regression analysis, warm and cold groups were only found as significant related factors for severe pain felt during procedure (p
目的:应用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)比较冷、热造影剂对不孕患者在子宫输卵管造影(HSG)术中及术后疼痛评分的影响,探讨热造影剂对自然妊娠率的影响。材料和方法:2017年3月- 9月的前瞻性随机研究。接受生殖细胞移植手术的原发性不孕症患者。记录患者的年龄、体重指数(BMI)、既往手术史、不孕持续时间和最痛月经期疼痛程度。在手术期间和手术后30分钟使用VAS对疼痛严重程度进行询问。在体温37℃下使用造影剂行HSG的患者被定义为温组(n:55),在室温23℃下使用造影剂行HSG的患者被定义为冷组(n:55)。结果:两组患者在年龄、BMI、不孕持续时间、既往手术及月经期间VAS评分均无显著差异。温组患者HSG的平均持续时间显著低于温组(p=0.001)。温组患者HSG时和术后30min VAS平均评分均显著低于对照组(5.3±4.2 vs 7.5±2.0)、(1.1±0.9 vs 2.4±1.4)。热组在HSG过程中剧烈疼痛的比例为25.5%,对照组为66.7%。在logistic回归分析中,温热组和冷组仅被发现为手术过程中感受到的严重疼痛的显著相关因素(p